Personality predicts obedience in a Milgram paradigm.

This study investigates how obedience in a Milgram-like experiment is predicted by interindividual differences. Participants were 35 males and 31 females aged 26-54 from the general population who were contacted by phone 8 months after their participation in a study transposing Milgram's obedience paradigm to the context of a fake television game show. Interviews were presented as opinion polls with no stated ties to the earlier experiment. Personality was assessed by the Big Five Mini-Markers questionnaire (Saucier, 1994). Political orientation and social activism were also measured. Results confirmed hypotheses that Conscientiousness and Agreeableness would be associated with willingness to administer higher-intensity electric shocks to a victim. Political orientation and social activism were also related to obedience. Our results provide empirical evidence suggesting that individual differences in personality and political variables matter in the explanation of obedience to authority.

[1]  E. Sturman,et al.  Involuntary subordination and its relation to personality, mood, and submissive behavior. , 2011, Psychological assessment.

[2]  S. Reicher,et al.  Working Toward the Experimenter , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[3]  A. Caspi,et al.  When Do Individual Differences Matter? A Paradoxical Theory of Personality Coherence , 1993 .

[4]  H. Kelman,et al.  Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. , 1990 .

[5]  G. Saucier.  Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. , 1994, Journal of personality assessment.

[6]  D. Paulhus,et al.  The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy , 2002 .

[7]  S. Milgram,et al.  Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance toward authoritative command. , 1966 .

[8]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[9]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .

[10]  Dimensions of horse personality based on owner and trainer supplied personality traits , 2008 .

[11]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values , 2002 .

[12]  Thomas A. Widiger,et al.  Psychometric Properties of an Abbreviated Instrument of the Five-Factor Model , 2006, Assessment (Odessa, Fla.).

[13]  D. Packer.  Identifying Systematic Disobedience in Milgram's Obedience Experiments: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[14]  E. Anderson.  Out of Character. , 1993, Postgraduate medicine.

[15]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Clarification of the Five-Factor Model With the Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex , 1993 .

[16]  H. Zeisel.  Eichmann in Jerusalem , 1964 .

[17]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? , 2002 .

[18]  J. Hogan,et al.  Conscientiousness and integrity at work , 1997 .

[19]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  The Open and Closed Mind , 1961 .

[20]  X. Bosch.  The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil , 2007 .

[21]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.

[22]  M. Withey,et al.  The Strong Situation Hypothesis , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[23]  A. Aragno.  THE ROOTS OF EVIL , 2014 .

[24]  Mel Slater,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[25]  John M. Doris,et al.  Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior , 2002 .

[26]  A. Miller,et al.  The social psychology of good and evil , 2004 .

[27]  Herbert C. Kelman,et al.  Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. , 1990 .

[28]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 1988 .

[29]  N. Russell.  Milgram's Obedience to Authority experiments: origins and early evolution. , 2011, The British journal of social psychology.

[30]  J Hogan,et al.  What we know about leadership. Effectiveness and personality. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[31]  Thomas Blass,et al.  Obedience to Authority: Current Perspectives on the Milgram Paradigm , 2000 .

[32]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  K. Haas.  Obedience: Submission to Destructive Orders as Related to Hostility , 1966, Psychological reports.

[34]  P. Costa,et al.  An assessment of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule from the perspective of the five-factor model. , 1992, Journal of personality assessment.

[35]  John Kekes,et al.  The Roots of Evil , 2005 .

[36]  B. Roberts,et al.  The Case for Conscientiousness: Evidence and Implications for a Personality Trait Marker of Health and Longevity , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[37]  Peter M. Burley,et al.  Effects of Social Intelligence on the Milgram Paradigm , 1977, Psychological reports.

[38]  Elaine E. Englehardt,et al.  Obstacles to Ethical Decision-Making: Mental Models, Milgram and the Problem of Obedience , 2013 .

[39]  M. Dambrun,et al.  Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment , 2009 .

[40]  Thomas Blass,et al.  The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years: Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority1 , 1999 .

[41]  D. Funder,et al.  The Person-situation Debate and the Assessment of Situations , 2012 .

[42]  L. Berkowitz.  Evil Is More Than Banal: Situationism and the Concept of Evil , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[43]  The prescriptive power of the television host. A transposition of Milgram's obedience paradigm to the context of TV game show , 2012 .

[44]  Thomas Blass,et al.  Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interactions. , 1991 .

[45]  M. Leary,et al.  Handbook of individual differences in social behavior , 2009 .

[46]  S BLAS,et al.  The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years : Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority ' THOMAS , 2006 .

[47]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Folk concepts, natural language, and psychological constructs: The California Psychological Inventory and the five-factor model. , 1993 .

[48]  C S Bergeman,et al.  Genetic and environmental effects on openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness: an adoption/twin study. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[49]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[50]  C. Welzel,et al.  Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: THE CONSEQUENCES OF VALUE CHANGE , 2005 .

[51]  C. Browning.  Becoming Eichmann: Rethinking the Life, Crimes, and Trial of a “Desk Murderer.” , 2007, Central European History.

[52]  C. Welzel,et al.  Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence , 2005 .

[53]  M. Deković,et al.  Mothers' and fathers' personality and parenting: the mediating role of sense of competence. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[54]  Neuroticism and Negative Affect Influence the Reluctance to Engage in Destructive Obedience in the Milgram Paradigm , 2013, The Journal of social psychology.

[55]  L. R. Goldberg.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[56]  In Their Own Words : Explaining Obedience to Authority Through an Examination of Participants ' , 2011 .

[57]  G. Roth,et al.  Sex, aggression and impulse control: An integrative account , 2008, Neurocase.

[58]  J. Simpson,et al.  The power of the situation: The impact of Milgram's obedience studies on personality and social psychology. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[59]  W. Meeus,et al.  Obedience in Modern Society: The Utrecht Studies , 1995 .

[60]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .

[61]  Alan C Elms.  Obedience lite. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[62]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Longitudinal Stability of Adult Personality , 1997 .

[63]  S. Milgram.  Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View , 1975 .

[64]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Y. Rim.  Importance of values according to personality, intelligence and sex , 1984 .

[66]  Personality as the basis for theoretical predilections. , 1988 .

[67]  To defy or not to defy: An experimental study of the dynamics of disobedience and whistle-blowing , 2012 .

[68]  J. Burger,et al.  In Their Own Words: Explaining Obedience to Authority Through an Examination of Participants' Comments , 2011 .

[69]  Hannah Arendt,et al.  Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil , 1964 .

[70]  A. Miller.  What can the Milgram obedience experiments tell us about the Holocaust?: Generalizing from the social psychology laboratory. , 2004 .

[71]  S. Hathaway,et al.  A Multiphasic Personality Schedule (Minnesota) : I. Construction of the Schedule , 1940 .

[72]  Jerry M. Burger,et al.  Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? , 2009, The American psychologist.

[73]  S. Gibson.  Milgram's obedience experiments: a rhetorical analysis. , 2013, The British journal of social psychology.

[74]  Yvonne Neudorf,et al.  A General Theory Of Crime , 2016 .

[75]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Prosociality: the contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[76]  D. Funder,et al.  Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[77]  G. Caprara,et al.  Basic Personal Values, Core Political Values, and Voting: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2010 .

[78]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Turning the Other Cheek , 2006, Psychological science.

[79]  A. Poropat.  A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.