Robust Competence Allocation for Multi-project Scheduling

To ensure proper functioning of an organization (e.g. production system) in settings in which there exists a risk of disruptions caused by unexpected employee absenteeism and/or a changing demand for employees with specific qualifications, one must move away from traditional approaches oriented towards the determination of procedures for generating workable baseline schedules that minimize the project makespan in a deterministic environment. The planner must take into account time uncertainties caused by an unexpected deviation of activity durations and resource availability uncertainties related to the fact that execution of tasks in a project depends on the availability of resources. The aim of this study was to develop a method “determining” a competence structure of employees, allowing for realizing proactive planning robust to unexpected staff absenteeism. To this end, we proposed a procedure for designing a competence framework that returns competence structures robust to disruptions caused by employee absenteeism. The procedure, derived from a declarative model, can be used to determine structures that allow to substitute redundant competences, thus ensuring robustness of the generated schedules to the types of absenteeism that are known a priori. The possibilities of practical application of the presented approach are illustrated with examples.

[1]  Grzegorz Bocewicz,et al.  Planning a teacher staff competence structure robust to unexpected personnel absence , 2019 .

[2]  Grzegorz Bocewicz,et al.  Competence Management in Teacher Assignment Planning , 2018, ICIST.

[3]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  A Three-Stage Manpower Planning and Scheduling Model - A Service-Sector Example , 1973, Oper. Res..

[4]  Katarzyna Antosz,et al.  Maintenance – identification and analysis of the competency gap , 2018, Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability.

[5]  Edyta Bombiak Human resources risk as an aspect of human resources management in turbulent environments , 2017 .

[6]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Personnel scheduling: A literature review , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Mohamed Haouari,et al.  Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Daniel Potthoff,et al.  Column Generation with Dynamic Duty Selection for Railway Crew Rescheduling , 2008, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Grzegorz Bocewicz,et al.  Declarative Modeling for Production Order Portfolio Scheduling , 2014 .

[10]  M. Klimek,et al.  Robustness of schedules for project scheduling problem with cash flow optimisation , 2013 .

[11]  Jaroslaw Wikarek,et al.  Implementation Aspects of Hybrid Solution Framework , 2014, Recent Advances in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques.

[12]  Shahram Shadrokh,et al.  A robust scheduling for the multi-mode project scheduling problem with a given deadline under uncertainty of activity duration , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[13]  Hasan Selim,et al.  Nurse scheduling using fuzzy modeling approach , 2010, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  M. Klimek,et al.  Robust Buffer Allocation for Scheduling of a Project with Predefined Milestones , 2009 .

[15]  Damien Trentesaux,et al.  Scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research directions , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT).

[16]  Przemyslaw Korytkowski,et al.  Competences-based performance model of multi-skilled workers with learning and forgetting , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Willy Herroelen,et al.  Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  A comparison of stochastic programming and bi-objective optimisation approaches to robust airline crew scheduling , 2011, OR Spectr..