Central and Peripheral Precuing of Forced-Choice Discrimination

There are suggestions in the literature that spatial precuing of attention with peripheral and central cues may be mediated by different mechanisms. To investigate this issue, data from two previous papers were reanalysed to investigate the complete time course of precuing target location with either: (1) a peripheral cue that may draw attention reflexively, or (2) a central, symbolic cue that may require attention to be directed voluntarily. This analysis led to predictions that were tested in another experiment. The main result of this experiment was that a peripheral cue produced its largest effects on discrimination performance within 100 msec, whereas a central cue required approximately 300 msec to achieve maximum effects. In conjunction with previous findings, the present evidence for time differences between the two cuing conditions suggests that more than one process is involved in the spatial precuing of attention.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal course of selective attention. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  The analysis of cross-classified categorical data , 1980 .

[3]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[6]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attention gating in short-term visual memory. , 1986, Psychological review.

[7]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Don R Lyon,et al.  How Quickly Can Attention Affect Form Perception , 1987 .

[10]  R. Klein,et al.  Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Cheal,et al.  Attention Effects on Form Discrimination at Different Eccentricities , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  H. Hawkins,et al.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  D. Lyon,et al.  Large and rapid improvement in form discrimination accuracy following a location precue. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[17]  M. Cheal,et al.  Does Attention Have Different Effects on Line Orientation and Line Arrangement Discrimination? , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology , 1993 .

[19]  I Craig,et al.  A critical look at the evidence , 1993 .