Strong, Long-Term Temporal Dynamics of an Ecological Network

Nature is organized into complex, dynamical networks of species and their interactions, which may influence diversity and stability. However, network research is, generally, short-term and depict ecological networks as static structures only, devoid of any dynamics. This hampers our understanding of how nature responds to larger disturbances such as changes in climate. In order to remedy this we studied the long-term (12-yrs) dynamics of a flower-visitation network, consisting of flower-visiting butterflies and their nectar plants. Global network properties, i.e. numbers of species and links, as well as connectance, were temporally stable, whereas most species and links showed a strong temporal dynamics. However, species of butterflies and plants varied bimodally in their temporal persistance: Sporadic species, being present only 1–2(-5) years, and stable species, being present (9-)11–12 years, dominated the networks. Temporal persistence and linkage level of species, i.e. number of links to other species, made up two groups of species: Specialists with a highly variable temporal persistence, and temporally stable species with a highly variable linkage level. Turnover of links of specialists was driven by species turnover, whereas turnover of links among generalists took place through rewiring, i.e. by reshuffling existing interactions. However, in spite of this strong internal dynamics of species and links the network appeared overall stable. If this global stability-local instability phenomenon is general, it is a most astonishing feature of ecological networks.

[1]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  A simple model of bipartite cooperation for ecological and organizational networks , 2009, Nature.

[2]  M. Newman,et al.  Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks , 2008, Nature.

[3]  R. Dennis,et al.  Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern , 2004 .

[4]  Ermias T. Azeria,et al.  Nestedness, niche metrics and temporal dynamics of a metacommunity in a dynamic natural model system , 2008 .

[5]  M. Tokeshi.  Dynamics of distribution in animal communities: Theory and analysis , 1992, Researches on Population Ecology.

[6]  Paulo Guimarães,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Matthias Albrecht,et al.  Plant-pollinator network assembly along the chronosequence of a glacier foreland , 2010 .

[8]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[9]  Horacio Ceva,et al.  Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[11]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. , 2008, Ecology.

[12]  Scott L. Collins,et al.  Importance of Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Species Regional Abundance and Distribution , 1991 .

[13]  Laura A Burkle,et al.  The future of plant-pollinator diversity: understanding interaction networks across time, space, and global change. , 2011, American journal of botany.

[14]  M. Morris,et al.  Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation , 1993 .

[15]  Joseph Tzanopoulos,et al.  Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[16]  G. Woodward,et al.  Community persistence in Broadstone Stream (U.K.) over three decades , 2002 .

[17]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly, Thymelicus flavus : when to switch? , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  A. Magurran,et al.  Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions , 2003, Nature.

[20]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Changes of a mutualistic network over time: reanalysis over a 10-year period. , 2010, Ecology.

[21]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[22]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[24]  Corinne Vacher,et al.  Architecture of an Antagonistic Tree/Fungus Network: The Asymmetric Influence of Past Evolutionary History , 2008, PloS one.

[25]  A. Traveset,et al.  Factors influencing the degree of generalization in flower use by Mediterranean butterflies , 2009 .

[26]  Guy Woodward,et al.  From Broadstone to Zackenberg: Space, time and hierarchies in ecological networks , 2010 .

[27]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Year‐to‐year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network , 2008 .