Terrorism threats and preparedness in Canada: the perspective of the Canadian public.

Although Canada has not experienced a major terrorist attack, an increased global pending threat has put preparedness at the top of the Canadian government's agenda. Given its strong multicultural community and close proximity to the recently targeted United States, the Canadian experience is unique. However, minimal research exists on the public's reactions to terrorism threats and related preparedness strategies. In order for response initiatives to be optimally effective, it is important that the public's opinions regarding terrorism and preparedness be considered. This qualitative study examined perceptions of terrorism threats among Canadians living in Central and Eastern Canada (N = 75) in the fall of 2004. Conceptualizations of terrorism threat, psychosocial impacts, and sense of preparedness were explored in a series of qualitative interviews. Findings revealed that the majority of Canadians did not feel overly threatened by terrorist attacks, due in part to a perception of terrorist threats as related to global sociopolitical events and a positive Canadian identity. In addition, while most respondents did not feel they were individually affected by the threat of terrorism, there was some concern regarding larger societal impacts, such as increased paranoia, discrimination, and threats to civil liberties. Participants' views on preparedness focused largely on the utility of emergency preparedness strategies and the factors that could mitigate or inhibit preparedness at the individual and institutional levels, with a specific focus on education. Finally, the significant relevance of these findings in shaping terrorism preparedness, both in Canada and generally, is discussed.

[1]  T. Grothmann,et al.  People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others Do Not , 2006 .

[2]  Teresa A. Myers,et al.  The Polls—Trends Twenty Years of Public Opinion about Global Warming , 2007 .

[3]  D. Mileti,et al.  The social psychology of public response to warnings of a nuclear power plant accident. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Chemical (VX) terrorist threat: public knowledge, attitudes, and responses. , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[5]  L. Krefting Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[6]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  C. Brewin,et al.  Psychological and behavioural reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005: cross sectional survey of a representative sample of Londoners , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Recent EFFECTS OF FEAR AND ANGER ON PERCEIVED RISKS OF TERRORISMA National Field Experiment , 2015 .

[9]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[10]  D. Krewski,et al.  Public Perception of Terrorism Threats and Related Information Sources in Canada: Implications for the Management of Terrorism Risks , 2006 .

[11]  M. Lindell,et al.  Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard , 2000 .

[12]  A. Graefe,et al.  Influence of terrorism risk on foreign tourism decisions. , 1998 .

[13]  Kim Harrison,et al.  Public perceptions and risk communications for botulism. , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[14]  L. Huddy,et al.  Trends: Reactions to the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 , 2002 .

[15]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Lay Foibles and Expert Fables in Judgments about Risk , 1982 .

[16]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Intuitive Toxicology. II. Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks in Canada , 1995 .

[17]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  H. Heath,et al.  Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. , 2004, International journal of nursing studies.

[19]  R. Wray,et al.  What does the public want to know in the event of a terrorist attack using plague? , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[20]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  A psychosocial risk assessment and management framework to enhance response to CBRN terrorism threats and attacks. , 2005, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[22]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[23]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Protection Motivation and Risk Communication , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Steven M Becker,et al.  Emergency communication and information issues in terrorist events involving radioactive materials. , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.