INTERACTION AND SYNTACTIC PRIMING: English L2 Speakers' Production of Dative Constructions

Interaction research about the role of language production in second language (L2) development has focused largely on modified output, specifically learners' responses to negative feedback (Iwashita, 2001; Loewen & Philp, in press; Mackey & Philp, 1998; McDonough, 2005; McDonough & Mackey, in press; Nobuyoshi & Ellis, 1993; Pica, 1988; Shehadeh, 2001). However, other processes involved in language production might help account for the beneficial relationship between interaction and L2 development. This paper reports the findings of two experiments that examined the occurrence of syntactic priming—a speaker's tendency to produce a previously spoken or heard structure—during interaction between L2 English speakers. Both studies used confederate scripting to elicit dative constructions from advanced English L2 speakers. In experiment 1, the participants (n = 50) were exposed to both prepositional and double-object dative primes. The linear mixed-model analysis indicated that syntactic priming occurred with prepositional datives only. In experiment 2, the English L2 participants (n = 54) received double-object dative primes only; results showed no evidence of syntactic priming. The implications are discussed in terms of the potential role of syntactic priming in driving L2 development in interactive contexts.This research was supported by grants (03135 and 04184) from the campus research board at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I am grateful to Nick Ellis, Susan Gass, Alison Mackey, and Pavel Trofimovich for their insightful comments on this paper and to Ron Crawford for his assistance with the coding. Any errors, of course, are my own.

[1]  Lydia White,et al.  Positive Evidence and Preemption in the Second Language Classroom , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  Meny C. PorrBn.  The Regeneration of Syntax in Short Term Memory , 2006 .

[3]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Structural priming across languages , 2003 .

[4]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings? , 1998 .

[5]  M. Swain.  Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[6]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Structural priming: Purely syntactic? , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[7]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. , 2003, Developmental science.

[8]  M. Tomasello.  Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[9]  MenY C. Porren.  Regeneration i the Short-Term Recall of Sentences , 2006 .

[10]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[12]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[13]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[14]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Activation of Syntactic Information During Language Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  R. Jackendoff.  On Larson's treatment of the double object construction , 1990 .

[16]  M. Pickering,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? , 2004, Psychological science.

[17]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992 .

[18]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Acquiring the transitive construction in English: the role of animacy and pronouns , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[19]  T. Pica.  Interlanguage Adjustments as an Outcome of NS‐NNS Negotiated Interaction , 1988 .

[20]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language , 1995 .

[21]  N. Ellis.  REFLECTIONS ON FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[22]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order , 2005 .

[23]  Noriko Iwashita,et al.  The Effect of Learner Proficiency on Interactional Moves and Modified Output in Nonnative-Nonnative Interaction in Japanese as a Foreign Language. , 2001 .

[24]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? , 2003, Cognition.

[25]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Persistence in Dutch , 1998, Language and speech.

[26]  Rod Ellis.  The Interaction Hypothesis: A Critical Evaluation. , 1991 .

[27]  ZhaoHong Han.  A Study of the Impact of Recasts on Tense Consistency in L2 Output , 2002 .

[28]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Priming Word Order in Sentence Production , 1999 .

[29]  S. Gries,et al.  Do foreign language learners also have constructions , 2005 .

[30]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Robert S. Williams.  A Statistical Analysis of English Double Object Alternation , 1994 .

[32]  J. Pine,et al.  Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category , 1998 .

[33]  Alison Mackey,et al.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[34]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation , 1989 .

[35]  Jacquelyn Schachter,et al.  Corrective feedback in historical perspective , 1991 .

[36]  T. Pica.  Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal about Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes?. , 1994 .

[37]  Kate Wolfe-Quintero.  The connection between verbs and argument structures: Native speaker production of the double object dative , 1998, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[38]  W. Snyder.  The structure and acquisition of English dative constructions , 1997 .

[39]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[40]  M. Pickering,et al.  The interactive-alignment model: Developments and refinements , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  M. Pickering,et al.  Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. , 2002 .

[42]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[43]  Irene Mazurkewich,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF THE DATIVE ALTERNATION BY SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY , 1984 .

[44]  A. Goldberg.  The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction , 1992 .

[45]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Interactional feedback and children’s L2 development , 2002 .

[46]  Dalila Ayoun,et al.  The Role of Negative and Positive Feedback in the Second Language Acquisition of the Passé Composé and Imparfait , 2001 .

[47]  M. Swain,et al.  Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning , 1995, Applied Linguistics.

[48]  Jane B. Childers,et al.  The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[49]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Syntactic priming in young children , 2004 .

[50]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Language input and child syntax , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  M. Swain.  The output hypothesis : Just speaking and writing aren't enough , 1993 .

[52]  Roger Hawkins,et al.  Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers , 1987 .

[53]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  J. Leeman.  RECASTS AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[55]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Differential Age Effects on Semantic and Syntactic Priming , 1998 .

[56]  Michael H. Long,et al.  The Role of Implicit Negative Feedback in SLA: Models and Recasts in Japanese and Spanish , 1998 .

[57]  Ali Shehadeh,et al.  Self- and Other-initiated Modified Output during Task-based Interaction. , 2001 .

[58]  Jacquelyn Schachter,et al.  THREE APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF INPUT , 1986 .

[59]  R. Larson.  On the double object construction , 1988 .

[60]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Support from Language Processing for a Constructional Approach to Grammar , 2005 .

[61]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. (Target article) , 2002 .

[62]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[63]  P. J. Meijer,et al.  Building Syntactic Structure in Speaking , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[64]  Noriko Iwashita.  NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND POSITIVE EVIDENCE IN TASK-BASED INTERACTION , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[65]  N. Ellis.  Emergentism, Connectionism, and Language Learning. , 1998 .

[66]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[67]  M. Potter,et al.  Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences , 1990 .

[68]  Martha Trahey.  Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long-term effects , 1996 .

[69]  Yukio Oba,et al.  ON THE DOUBLE OBJECT CONSTRUCTION , 1993 .

[70]  K. Demuth,et al.  Rules and construction effects in learning the argument structure of verbs. , 2003, Journal of child language.

[71]  Sophia linguistica : working papers in linguistics , 1975 .

[72]  M. Potter,et al.  Syntactic Priming in Immediate Recall of Sentences , 1998 .

[73]  Alison Mackey.  Interactional feedback on L2 morpho-syntax:Learners' perceptions and developmental outcomes , 2000 .

[74]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Closed-class immanence in sentence production , 1989, Cognition.

[75]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production , 2003, Cognition.

[76]  Shunji Inagaki,et al.  Japanese and Chinese Learners' Acquisition of the Narrow‐Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English , 1997 .

[77]  B. D. Schwartz,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL AND SYNTACTIC TRANSFER IN CHILD L2 ACQUISITION OF THE ENGLISH DATIVE ALTERNATION , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[78]  M. Swain.  Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[79]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[80]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure , 1991, Cognition.

[81]  K. Bock,et al.  Structure in language. Creating form in talk. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[82]  Kim Mcdonough,et al.  IDENTIFYING THE IMPACT OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNERS' RESPONSES ON ESL QUESTION DEVELOPMENT , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[83]  Betty Le Compagnon.  Interference and Overgeneralization in Second Language Learning: The Acquisition of English Dative Verbs by Native Speakers of French. , 1984 .

[84]  Stefanie Wulff,et al.  Do foreign language learners also have constructions ? Evidence from priming , sorting , and corpora * , 2005 .

[85]  N. Ellis.  AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[86]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  Road and Narrow Constraints on the English Dative Alternation: Some Fundamental Differences Between Native Speakers and Foreign Language Learners , 1992 .

[87]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production , 2000, Cognition.

[88]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  The regeneration of syntax in short term memory , 1992 .

[89]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[90]  J. Pine,et al.  Individual differences in early vocabulary development: redefining the referential-expressive distinction , 1992, Journal of Child Language.

[91]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[92]  R. Ellis,et al.  Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition , 1993 .

[93]  Marjolein Groefsema,et al.  The real-world colour of the dative alternation , 2001 .

[94]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[95]  Joyce Tang Boyland,et al.  Evidence that Syntactic Priming is Long Lasting , 2008 .

[96]  A. L. Campbell,et al.  The acquisition of English dative constructions , 2001, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[97]  William Snyder,et al.  On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word-Formation , 2001 .