Performance evaluations, need for cognition, and the acquisition of a complex skill: an attribute–treatment interaction

Abstract We proposed that intermittent evaluations of performance could be used to promote the acquisition of a complex skill. We also hypothesized that trainees low in need for cognition (NFC) would benefit more from intermittent evaluations compared to trainees high in NFC. Accordingly, 106 young adult males participated in 5 h of training in order to learn a complex computer task that simulated the demands of a dynamic aviation environment. Trainees’ performance was assessed either intermittently during training or at the end of training. Results indicated that intermittent performance evaluations enhanced the skill-based learning of trainees low in NFC, whereas intermittent skill evaluations tended to undermine the skill-based learning of trainees high in NFC. The findings are discussed in relation to Deci’s (1975) theory of intrinsic motivation and the need for more research examining attribute–treatment interactions with respect to training and skill acquisition.

[1]  E. Donchin,et al.  The space fortress game , 1989 .

[2]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[3]  C. J. Sadowski,et al.  Association of Need for Cognition and Course Performance , 1992 .

[4]  R. Snow,et al.  Lecture 2: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Aptitude for Learning from Instruction , 1984 .

[5]  D. Gopher.  The skill of attention control: acquisition and execution of attention strategies , 1993 .

[6]  D. Day,et al.  Development of a Short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test , 1994 .

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[8]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[9]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[10]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Individual and team training. , 2002 .

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[12]  Jeffrey A. Jordan,et al.  Visual attention: Individual differences in training and predicting complex task performance , 1995 .

[13]  S. Dornič,et al.  Tolerance for mental effort: Self-ratings related to perception, performance and personality , 1991 .

[14]  D. Gopher,et al.  Transfer of Skill from a Computer Game Trainer to Flight , 1994 .

[15]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[16]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  The Transfer of Skill from a Computer Game Trainer to Actual Flight , 1992 .

[17]  C. J. Sadowski,et al.  Need for Cognition in the Big-Five Factor Structure , 1997 .

[18]  W. Shebilske,et al.  Interlesson spacing and task-related processing during complex skill acquisition. , 1999 .

[19]  Bruce W. Tuckman,et al.  Using tests as an incentive to motivate procrastinators to study , 1998 .