“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Greg Restall. Four-valued semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals) , 1995, J. Philos. Log..
[2] Richard Routley,et al. The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics , 1984 .
[3] J. Michael Dunn,et al. Relevance Logic and Entailment , 1986 .
[4] J. Dunn,et al. Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and ‘coupled trees’ , 1976 .
[5] R. Meyer,et al. The semantics of entailment — III , 1973 .
[6] Nuel D. Belnap,et al. A Useful Four-Valued Logic , 1977 .
[7] Richard Sylvan,et al. The semantics of entailment—II , 1972, Journal of Philosophical Logic.
[8] Nuel D. Belnap,et al. Entailment : the logic of relevance and necessity , 1975 .
[9] Edwin D. Mares,et al. A star-free semantics for R , 1995, Journal of Symbolic Logic.