Analysis and interpretation of variability in soundscapes along an urban–rural gradient

Abstract Urbanization has not only altered land cover types, but also changed acoustic environments to which animals must adapt or emigrate for effective communication. Although many studies have addressed the effects of urban noise on acoustic communication of vocal organisms, little work has been done to understand the acoustic characteristics and the interaction between biological and anthropogenic sounds across urban–rural landscapes. The objectives of this study were to investigate the spatial and temporal patterns of soundscape characteristics along an urban–rural gradient, and how soundscape properties are related to avian species community. We established 17 locations across the city of Lansing, Michigan from February to December 2006 to record environmental sounds. A multilevel regression model (MLRM) was used to understand the variability of acoustic power of biological and anthropogenic sounds (biophony and anthrophony) with temporal and spatial data structures. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was employed to investigate how bird species respond along an environmental gradient. We found that soundscape characteristics were associated with the structure and composition of urban–rural landscapes. Biophony was inversely correlated with anthrophony along an urban–rural gradient. The results of the MLRM showed that the acoustic variability of biophony and anthrophony were associated with landscape attributes. The CCA revealed that the distribution of bird species was significantly related to the percent area of different land cover types. The study suggests that recording acoustic characteristics in urban systems can offer opportunities to not only measure ambient noise levels, but also understand how each component of soundscape is related to another.

[1]  K. Parris,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Effects of Roads and Traffic on Wildlife Populations and Landscape Function Frogs Call at a Higher Pitch in Traffic Noise , 2009 .

[2]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[3]  P. Warren,et al.  Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  S. Gage,et al.  Soundscape characteristics of an environment: A new ecological indicator of ecosystem health , 2008 .

[5]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  NON-METRIC ORDINATION METHODS IN ECOLOGY , 1977 .

[6]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  P. Welch.  The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[8]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[9]  J. L. Long,et al.  Introduced Birds of the World , 1982 .

[10]  M. Palmer.  PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER: THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS' , 1993 .

[11]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[12]  Paola Laiolo,et al.  The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation , 2010 .

[13]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .

[14]  Eugene P. Odum,et al.  Measurement of territory and home range size in birds , 1955 .

[15]  Poul Hansen.  Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation, and a hypothesis on its evolution , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  M. Willson,et al.  Avian Community Organization and Habitat Structure , 1974 .

[17]  Y. Matsinos,et al.  Spatio-temporal variability in human and natural sounds in a rural landscape , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  O. Gilbert,et al.  Urban Vegetation Research@@@Urban Ecology: Plants and Plant Communities in Urban Environments. , 1991 .

[19]  S. Gage,et al.  Assessment of ecosystem biodiversity by acoustic diversity indices , 2001 .

[20]  Harry Nyquist.  Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory , 1928 .

[21]  P. Hanson,et al.  Wireless Sensor Networks for Ecology , 2005 .

[22]  A. Magurran.  Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[23]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[24]  J. Berry,et al.  Analyzing Longitudinal Data with Multilevel Models: An Example with Individuals Living with Lower Extremity Intra-articular Fractures. , 2008, Rehabilitation psychology.

[25]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[26]  Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera,et al.  Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape , 2011 .

[27]  D. Sol,et al.  The Ecology of Bird Introductions , 2003 .

[28]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[29]  N. Grimm,et al.  Global Change and the Ecology of Cities , 2008, Science.

[30]  G. Boncoraglio,et al.  Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis , 2007 .

[31]  Basile Chaix,et al.  A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[32]  Emily J Mockford,et al.  Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  R. Blair.  Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[34]  H. Akaike.  Likelihood of a model and information criteria , 1981 .

[35]  Sarah L. Dumyahn,et al.  What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  K. Hobson,et al.  Acoustic surveys of birds using electronic recordings: new potential from an omnidirectional microphone system , 2002 .

[37]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[38]  C. Braak.  Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[39]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal , 2008, PloS one.

[40]  B. McCowan,et al.  Anthropogenic Noise and its Effect on Animal Communication: An Interface Between Comparative Psychology and Conservation Biology , 2003, International Journal of Comparative Psychology.

[41]  E. Morton.  Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[42]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[43]  B. Krause,et al.  Into a Wild Sanctuary: A Life in Music and Natural Sound , 1998 .

[44]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[45]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .