Movement and perception recalibrate differently across multiple days of locomotor learning.

Learning a new movement through error-based adaptation leads to recalibration of movement and altered perception of that movement. Although presumed to be closely related, the relationship between adaptation-based motor and perceptual changes is not well understood. Here we investigated the changes in motor behavior and leg speed perception over 5 days of split-belt treadmill adaptation. We specifically wanted to know if changes in the perceptual domain would demonstrate savings-like behavior (i.e., less recalibration with more practice) and if these changes would parallel the savings observed in the motor domain. We found that the recalibration of leg speed perception decreased across days of training, indicating savings-like behavior in this domain. However, we observed that the magnitude of savings across days was different between motor and perceptual domains. These findings suggest a degree of independence between the motor and perceptual processes that occur with locomotor adaptation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Error-based adaptation learning drives changes in movement and perception of movement. Are these changes across domains linked or simply coincidental? Here, we studied changes in movement and perception across 5 days of repeated locomotor adaptation. Savings-like behavior in the motor and perceptual domains developed with different magnitudes and over different timescales, leading us to conclude that motor and perceptual processes operate at least somewhat independently during locomotor adaptation.

[1]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Motor learning and its sensory effects: time course of perceptual change and its presence with gradual introduction of load. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Ryan T. Roemmich,et al.  Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning , 2016, Current Biology.

[5]  Erin K. Cressman,et al.  Generalization of reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration at different distances in the workspace , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Creating flexible motor memories in human walking , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  D. Henriques,et al.  Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Bastian,et al.  Split-belt walking adaptation recalibrates sensorimotor estimates of leg speed but not position or force. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  S. M. Morton,et al.  Neurophysiologic and Rehabilitation Insights From the Split-Belt and Other Locomotor Adaptation Paradigms , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[10]  D. Henriques,et al.  Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Motor Adaptation Training for Faster Relearning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Accelerating locomotor savings in learning: compressing four training days to one. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Amy J. Bastian,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Control Contribute to Step Length Asymmetry During Split-Belt Adaptation and Hemiparetic Gait , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Two ways to save a newly learned motor pattern. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Treadmill experience mediates the perceptual-motor aftereffect of treadmill walking , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  K. Cullen Sensory signals during active versus passive movement , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,et al.  Cerebellar Contributions to Reach Adaptation and Learning Sensory Consequences of Action , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Amy J. Bastian,et al.  Making Sense of Cerebellar Contributions to Perceptual and Motor Adaptation , 2018, The Cerebellum.

[19]  D. Henriques,et al.  Proprioceptive recalibration in the right and left hands following abrupt visuomotor adaptation , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  D. Henriques,et al.  Proprioceptive recalibration following prolonged training and increasing distortions in visuomotor adaptation , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Wouter Hoogkamer,et al.  Gait asymmetry during early split-belt walking is related to perception of belt speed difference. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  P. Thier,et al.  The Cerebellum Updates Predictions about the Visual Consequences of One's Behavior , 2008, Current Biology.

[23]  Erin K Cressman,et al.  Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Ostry,et al.  Sensory Plasticity in Human Motor Learning , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  T. Brashers-Krug,et al.  Functional Stages in the Formation of Human Long-Term Motor Memory , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Erin K Cressman,et al.  Visuomotor Adaptation and Proprioceptive Recalibration , 2012, Journal of motor behavior.

[27]  V. Dietz,et al.  Adaptational effects during human split-belt walking: influence of afferent input , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.