Fermentation broth components influence droplet coalescence and hinder advanced biofuel recovery during fermentation.

Developments in synthetic biology enabled the microbial production of long chain hydrocarbons, which can be used as advanced biofuels in aviation or transportation. Currently, these fuels are not economically competitive due to their production costs. The current process offers room for improvement: by utilizing lignocellulosic feedstock, increasing microbial yields, and using cheaper process technology. Gravity separation is an example of the latter, for which droplet growth by coalescence is crucial. The aim of this study was to study the effect of fermentation broth components on droplet coalescence. Droplet coalescence was measured using two setups: a microfluidic chip and regular laboratory scale stirred vessel (2 L). Some fermentation broth components had a large impact on droplet coalescence. Especially components present in hydrolysed cellulosic biomass and mannoproteins from the yeast cell wall retard coalescence. To achieve a technically feasible gravity separation that can be integrated with the fermentation, the negative effects of these components on coalescence should be minimized. This could be achieved by redesign of the fermentation medium or adjusting the fermentation conditions, aiming to minimize the release of surface active components by the microorganisms. This way, another step can be made towards economically feasible advanced biofuel production.

[1]  L. A. van der Wielen,et al.  Microbial advanced biofuels production: overcoming emulsification challenges for large-scale operation. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[2]  R. Boom,et al.  A microfluidic method to study demulsification kinetics. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[3]  D. Cooper,et al.  The mannoprotein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an effective bioemulsifier , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  A. Schirmer,et al.  Microbial Biosynthesis of Alkanes , 2010, Science.

[5]  J. Keasling,et al.  Engineering microbial biofuel tolerance and export using efflux pumps , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[6]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Power dissipation and heat production in bubble columns: Approach based on nonequilibrium thermodynamics , 1980 .

[7]  Wim M. G. T. van den Broek,et al.  Comparison of Plate Separator, Centrifuge and Hydrocyclone , 1998 .

[8]  Ak Allen Chesters.  The modelling of coalescence processes in fluid-liquid dispersions : a review of current understanding , 1991 .

[9]  Murray R. Gray,et al.  Stabilization of Oil-Water Emulsions by Hydrophobic Bacteria , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  C. P. Whitby,et al.  Shear-induced coalescence of oil-in-water Pickering emulsions. , 2011, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[11]  D. Mcclements.  Food Emulsions: Principles, Practices, and Techniques, Third Edition , 2015 .

[12]  Ronny Hänsch,et al.  Automated drop detection using image analysis for online particle size monitoring in multiphase systems , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[13]  Andreas Schirmer,et al.  New microbial fuels: a biotech perspective. , 2009, Current opinion in microbiology.

[14]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Metabolic engineering of microbial pathways for advanced biofuels production. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[15]  Maria C Cuellar,et al.  Breaking oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by yeast. , 2015, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[16]  A. Lee,et al.  Droplet coalescence by geometrically mediated flow in microfluidic channels , 2007 .

[17]  Suzanne M. Kresta,et al.  Correlation of mean drop size and minimum drop size with the turbulence energy dissipation and the flow in an agitated tank , 1998 .

[18]  M. S. Doulah.  An Effect of Hold-up on Drop Sizes in Liquid-Liquid Dispersions , 1975 .

[19]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuels production: from bugs to synthetic biology to fuels. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[20]  R. Boom,et al.  Coalescence dynamics of surfactant-stabilized emulsions studied with microfluidics , 2012 .

[21]  A. Wilhelm Neumann,et al.  Determination of Surface Tension and Contact Angle from the Shapes of Axisymmetric Fluid Interfaces without Use of Apex Coordinates , 2006 .

[22]  Anneli Petersson,et al.  Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007 .

[23]  Jean-Christophe Baret,et al.  Kinetic aspects of emulsion stabilization by surfactants: a microfluidic analysis. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  Y. Liao,et al.  A literature review on mechanisms and models for the coalescence process of fluid particles , 2010 .

[25]  Sebastian Maaß,et al.  Experimental comparison of measurement techniques for drop size distributions in liquid/liquid dispersions , 2011 .

[26]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Determination of coalescence frequencies in liquid—liquid dispersions: effect of drop size dependence , 1990 .

[27]  A. Florence,et al.  Stabilization of oil-in-water emulsions by nonionic detergents: V. The effect of salts on rates of coalescence in a chlorobenzene emulsion , 1971 .

[28]  N. B. Raikar,et al.  Incorporating emulsion drop coalescence into population balance equation models of high pressure homogenization , 2012 .