Characterizing, measuring, and managing transit service quality

Summary Recent studies to evaluate the quality of transit service are generating a good amount of renewed interest in an old idea, the passenger's perspective; this new interest stems from recognizing that transit service quality should be characterised, measured, and managed by parameters capturing both passenger and transit operator perspectives. However, although the selected parameters are user-oriented in their input, the output may not be as user-oriented as considered, and the number or the percentage of passengers is often neglected. As a result, the findings are often misleading because the perspectives of transit operators dominate. Therefore, academics and practitioners must rethink their strategies of quality analysis of public transportation by stressing more on the role of passengers. These challenges are addressed in this paper with a practical, simple, and holistic framework, for Transit Quality (TRANSQUAL). This framework provides for the involvement of all stakeholders in the characterisation, measurement, and management of the stages of quality monitoring, which is jointly analyzed at different planning levels. In the characterization stage, the framework supports the selection of parameters to be monitored. The measurement stage sets and measures four quality areas in terms of percentage of passengers who expect a predefined level of service, for whom the service is designed, who receive the planned service, and who perceive the service as delivered. The management stage computes the differences between these percentages, points out criticalities, and recommends corrective actions. These stages are investigated in-depth, integrated, and discussed in a real-life case study. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Teas,et al.  Expectations, Performance Evaluation, and Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality , 1993 .

[2]  Luigi dell’Olio,et al.  The quality of service desired by public transport users , 2011 .

[3]  Jie Lin,et al.  A quality control framework for bus schedule reliability , 2008 .

[4]  Peter G Furth,et al.  Using Archived AVL-APC Data to Improve Transit Performance and Management , 2006 .

[5]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  A Stochastic Traffic Assignment Model Considering Differences in Passengers Utility Functions , 2000 .

[6]  Chung-Wei Kuo,et al.  Relationships among service quality, corporate image, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention for the elderly in high speed rail services , 2013 .

[7]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  Face to face and telephone interviews as competing yet complementary methods to elicit information , 2013 .

[8]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  Rethinking bus punctuality by integrating Automatic Vehicle Location data and passenger patterns , 2015 .

[9]  R. Teas,et al.  Consumer Expectations and the Measurement of Perceived Service Quality , 1993 .

[10]  George G. Earl,et al.  Public transport service quality and sustainable development: A community stakeholder perspective , 2010 .

[11]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  An Offline Framework for Handling Automatic Passenger Counting Raw Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  Laura Eboli,et al.  How to Capture the Passengers’ Point of View on a Transit Service through Rating and Choice Options , 2010 .

[13]  J. Dawes.  Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales , 2008 .

[14]  E. Carlquist,et al.  Incentive Contracts in Norwegian Local Public Transport: The Hordaland Model , 2001 .

[15]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[16]  Margareta Friman.  IMPLEMENTING QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT , 2004 .

[17]  M. O’Mahony,et al.  Examining the factors that impact public transport commuting satisfaction , 2009 .

[18]  F. Buttle.  SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda , 1996 .

[19]  Laura Eboli,et al.  A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view , 2011 .

[20]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  On the attributes and influencing factors of end-users quality perceptions in urban transport: An exploratory analysis , 2013 .

[21]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Juan de Oña,et al.  Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches , 2015, Transp. Sci..

[23]  Riadh Ladhari.  A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research , 2009 .

[24]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  Regularity analysis on bus networks and route directions by automatic vehicle location raw data , 2013 .

[25]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[26]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT AND CUSTOMER PERCEIVED QUALITY: A CASE STUDY IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA OF CAGLIARI, ITALY , 2011 .

[27]  Anil Kashyap,et al.  Bus Transit Service Quality Monitoring in the UK: A Methodological Framework , 2011 .

[28]  T. Gärling,et al.  FREQUENCY OF NEGATIVE CRITICAL INCIDENTS AND SATISFACTION WITH PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES , 2001 .

[29]  Rodrigo Fernandez,et al.  Modelling public transport stops by microscopic simulation , 2008 .

[30]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  Measuring service quality in urban bus transport: a modified SERVQUAL approach , 2012 .

[31]  David Pitfield,et al.  ELASTIC – A methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators , 2010 .

[32]  Markus Fellesson,et al.  Service Supply and Customer Satisfaction in Public Transportation: The Quality Paradox , 2009 .