Morphological growth dynamics, mechanical stability, and active microtubule mechanics underlying spindle self-organization

Significance The spindle is a microtubule-based, self-organized structure essential for equal segregation of chromosomes during cell division. The spindle’s bipolar shape is robustly maintained for the segregation accuracy but is occasionally disrupted, yielding multipolar phenotypes. How microtubules favor nonbipolar self-organization despite high bipolar stability is not known. Here, we find that this stems from the bistable nature of microtubule self-organization within the cytoplasm, which paves a separate route of multipolar organization from a bipolar phenotype. We also find that these two phenotypes infrequently switch upon maturation and by perturbed force, indicating the structure’s mechanical plasticity underlying the bistability. Our study thus reveals the mechanics governing the robust yet stochastic nature of spindle morphogenesis, which has relevance to tumors and unhealthy oocytes.

[1]  W. Möbius,et al.  Mechanism of spindle pole organization and instability in human oocytes , 2022, Science.

[2]  C. Tischer,et al.  Volumetric morphometry reveals spindle width as the best predictor of mammalian spindle scaling , 2021, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  K. Hsia,et al.  Karyopherin Kap114p‐mediated trans‐repression controls ribosomal gene expression under saline stress , 2020, EMBO reports.

[4]  Y. Maeda,et al.  Mechanically Distinct Microtubule Arrays Determine the Length and Force Response of the Meiotic Spindle. , 2019, Developmental cell.

[5]  F. Nédélec,et al.  Determinants of Polar versus Nematic Organization in Networks of Dynamic Microtubules and Mitotic Motors , 2018, Cell.

[6]  D. Needleman,et al.  Cooperative Accumulation of Dynein-Dynactin at Microtubule Minus-Ends Drives Microtubule Network Reorganization. , 2018, Developmental cell.

[7]  Jun Takagi,et al.  High-quality frozen extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs reveal size-dependent control of metaphase spindle micromechanics , 2017, bioRxiv.

[8]  R. Heald,et al.  A versatile multivariate image analysis pipeline reveals features of Xenopus extract spindles , 2016, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Scott Forth,et al.  Measuring Pushing and Braking Forces Generated by Ensembles of Kinesin-5 Crosslinking Two Microtubules. , 2015, Developmental cell.

[10]  Kay Elder,et al.  Error-prone chromosome-mediated spindle assembly favors chromosome segregation defects in human oocytes , 2015, Science.

[11]  T. Kapoor,et al.  Reconstitution of the augmin complex provides insights into its architecture and function , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  H. Maiato,et al.  Mitotic spindle multipolarity without centrosome amplification , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.

[13]  T. Kapoor,et al.  Micromechanics of the vertebrate meiotic spindle examined by stretching along the pole-to-pole axis. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[14]  G. Goshima,et al.  Genes involved in centrosome-independent mitotic spindle assembly in Drosophila S2 cells , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Kapoor,et al.  Using micromanipulation to analyze control of vertebrate meiotic spindle size. , 2013, Cell reports.

[16]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Branching Microtubule Nucleation in Xenopus Egg Extracts Mediated by Augmin and TPX2 , 2013, Cell.

[17]  Patricia A. Hunt,et al.  Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  P. Meraldi,et al.  CLASPs prevent irreversible multipolarity by ensuring spindle-pole resistance to traction forces during chromosome alignment , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  David Pellman,et al.  Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  R. Vale,et al.  Augmin promotes meiotic spindle formation and bipolarity in Xenopus egg extracts , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  A. Hyman,et al.  Beyond stereospecificity: liquids and mesoscale organization of cytoplasm. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[22]  Shin'ichi Ishiwata,et al.  Insights into the Micromechanical Properties of the Metaphase Spindle , 2011, Cell.

[23]  Christopher P. Arthur,et al.  Insights into Antiparallel Microtubule Crosslinking by PRC1, a Conserved Nonmotor Microtubule Binding Protein , 2010, Cell.

[24]  R. Durbin,et al.  Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes , 2010, Nature.

[25]  A. Kimura,et al.  New look inside the spindle: microtubule-dependent microtubule generation within the spindle. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[26]  L. Mirny,et al.  Fast Microtubule Dynamics in Meiotic Spindles Measured by Single Molecule Imaging: Evidence That the Spindle Environment Does Not Stabilize Microtubules , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Force and Length in the Mitotic Spindle , 2009, Current Biology.

[28]  Timothy J. Mitchison,et al.  Compression Regulates Mitotic Spindle Length by a Mechanochemical Switch at the Poles , 2009, Current Biology.

[29]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Spindle Fusion Requires Dynein-Mediated Sliding of Oppositely Oriented Microtubules , 2009, Current Biology.

[30]  I. Shimoyama,et al.  Probing the mechanical architecture of the vertebrate meiotic spindle , 2009, Nature Methods.

[31]  Miki Y. Matsuo,et al.  Ordered Patterns of Cell Shape and Orientational Correlation during Spontaneous Cell Migration , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  D. Pellman,et al.  Mechanisms to suppress multipolar divisions in cancer cells with extra centrosomes. , 2008, Genes & development.

[33]  W. Bement,et al.  Myosin-10 and actin filaments are essential for mitotic spindle function , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  R. Heald,et al.  The RanGTP gradient – a GPS for the mitotic spindle , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[35]  G. Goshima,et al.  Augmin: a protein complex required for centrosome-independent microtubule generation within the spindle , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  R. Wollman,et al.  Genes Required for Mitotic Spindle Assembly in Drosophila S2 Cells , 2007, Science.

[37]  E. Hannak,et al.  Investigating mitotic spindle assembly and function in vitro using Xenopus laevis egg extracts , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[38]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  Making Microtubules and Mitotic Spindles in Cells without Functional Centrosomes , 2006, Current Biology.

[39]  E. Peterman,et al.  The bipolar mitotic kinesin Eg5 moves on both microtubules that it crosslinks , 2005, Nature.

[40]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Microtubule plus-end dynamics in Xenopus egg extract spindles. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[41]  G. Danuser,et al.  Quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy: where it came from and where it is going , 2003, Journal of microscopy.

[42]  I. Vernos,et al.  The Mitotic Spindle: A Self-Made Machine , 2001, Science.

[43]  Iain W. Mattaj,et al.  Ran–GTP coordinates regulation of microtubule nucleation and dynamics during mitotic-spindle assembly , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[44]  Timothy J. Mitchison,et al.  Probing Spindle Assembly Mechanisms with Monastrol, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Mitotic Kinesin, Eg5 , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  S. Haggarty,et al.  Small molecule inhibitor of mitotic spindle bipolarity identified in a phenotype-based screen. , 1999, Science.

[46]  Eric Karsenti,et al.  Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts , 1996, Nature.

[47]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Mitosis in a cell with multiple centrioles , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularized linear discriminant analysis and its application in microarrays. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[49]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Modeling mitosis. , 2006, Trends in cell biology.

[50]  Torsten Wittmann,et al.  The spindle: a dynamic assembly of microtubules and motors , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[51]  D. Compton,et al.  Spindle assembly in animal cells. , 2000, Annual review of biochemistry.