Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer.

PURPOSE To estimate the radiation-related lung cancer risks associated with annual low-dose computed tomographic (CT) lung screening in adult smokers and former smokers, and to establish a baseline risk that the potential benefits of such screening should exceed. MATERIALS AND METHODS The estimated lung radiation dose from low-dose CT lung examinations corresponds to a dose range for which there is direct evidence of increased cancer risk in atomic bomb survivors. Estimated dose-, sex-, and smoking status-dependent excess relative risks of lung cancer were derived from cancer incidence data for atomic bomb survivors and used to calculate the excess lung cancer risks associated with a single CT lung examination at a given age in a U.S. population. From these, the overall radiation risks associated with annual CT lung screening were estimated. RESULTS A 50-year-old female smoker who undergoes annual CT lung screening until age 75 would incur an estimated radiation-related lung cancer risk of 0.85%, in addition to her otherwise expected lung cancer risk of approximately 17%. The radiation-associated cancer risk to other organs would be far lower. If 50% of all current and former smokers in the U.S. population aged 50-75 years received annual CT screening, the estimated number of lung cancers associated with radiation from screening would be approximately 36,000, a 1.8% (95% credibility interval: 0.5%, 5.5%) increase over the otherwise expected number. CONCLUSION Given the estimated upper limit of a 5.5% increase in lung cancer risk attributable to annual CT-related radiation exposure, a mortality benefit of considerably more than 5% may be necessary to outweigh the potential radiation risks.

[1]  S J Swensen,et al.  A Consensus Statement of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Screening for Lung Cancer with Helical Computed Tomography , 2001, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[2]  Y Mao,et al.  Lifetime probability of developing lung cancer, by smoking status, Canada. , 1994, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[3]  A. Vergnenègre,et al.  Radon et exposition domestique. , 2000 .

[4]  Donald W Kufe,et al.  Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Enhances Endothelial Cell Survival and Tumor Radioresistance , 2002, Cancer journal.

[5]  D A Pierce,et al.  Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2000, Radiation research.

[6]  R. Hornung,et al.  Modifiers of exposure-response estimates for lung cancer among miners exposed to radon progeny. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  A. Neugut,et al.  Increased risk of lung cancer after breast cancer radiation therapy in cigarette smokers , 1994, Cancer.

[8]  R. Merrill Measuring the projected public health impact of lung cancer through lifetime and age-conditional risk estimates. , 2000, Annals of epidemiology.

[9]  S. Sone,et al.  Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Y. Tateno,et al.  Estimation of the Exposure and a Risk-Benefit Analysis for a CT System Designed for a Lung Cancer Mass Screening Unit , 1996 .

[11]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[12]  J. Law,et al.  Concerning the relationship between benefit and radiation risk, and cancers detected and induced, in a breast screening programme. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  M. Hande,et al.  Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation? , 2002, International journal of radiation biology.

[14]  D A Pierce,et al.  Joint Effects of Radiation and Smoking on Lung Cancer Risk among Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2003, Radiation research.

[15]  Hajime Nakata,et al.  Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT: results of baseline and 1-year follow-up studies. , 2002, Chest.

[16]  W. Maurer Breast cancer screening complacency and compliance. , 1995, Wisconsin medical journal.

[17]  Maurer Wj Breast cancer screening complacency and compliance. , 1995 .

[18]  Hironobu Ohmatsu,et al.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  L. Kupper,et al.  The relationship between environmental monitoring and biological markers in exposure assessment. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  B. Hillman,et al.  Economic, legal, and ethical rationales for the ACRIN national lung screening trial of CT screening for lung cancer. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[21]  B. Schueler,et al.  A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography. , 2001, Medical physics.

[22]  O S Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: coping with nihilistic recommendations. , 2001, Radiology.

[23]  D. Preston,et al.  Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part IV: Comparison of cancer incidence and mortality. , 1994, Radiation research.

[24]  J. Samet,et al.  Lung cancer mortality and exposure to radon progeny in a cohort of New Mexico underground uranium miners. , 1991, Health physics.

[25]  W C Black,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: not ready for routine practice. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  A. Vergnenègre,et al.  [Radon and domestic exposure]. , 2000, Revue des maladies respiratoires.

[27]  S. Swensen,et al.  Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[28]  J H Lubin,et al.  Radon-progeny exposure and lung cancer risk in a cohort of Newfoundland fluorspar miners. , 1998, Radiation research.

[29]  D. Preston,et al.  Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958-1987. , 1994, Radiation research.

[30]  E. Arias,et al.  United States life tables, 2000. , 2002, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[31]  B. Vastag Lung screening study to test popular CT scans. , 2002, JAMA.

[32]  Peter B Bach,et al.  Screening for lung cancer: the guidelines. , 2003, Chest.

[33]  L. Garfinkel,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN MORTALITY AND LONGEVITY BY SEX, SMOKING HABITS AND HEALTH STATUS , 1987 .

[34]  M. Spitz,et al.  Effects of smoking and radiotherapy on lung carcinoma in breast carcinoma survivors , 2003, Cancer.

[35]  D. Henson,et al.  Conditional survival among patients with carcinoma of the lung. , 1999, Chest.

[36]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: the first ten years. , 2002, Cancer journal.

[37]  W. K. Sinclair,et al.  The relative contributions of different organ sites to the total cancer mortality associated with low-dose radiation exposure , 1991, Annals of the ICRP.

[38]  V. Khokhryakov,et al.  INTERACTION OF RADIATION AND SMOKING IN LUNG CANCER INDUCTION AMONG WORKERS AT THE MAYAK NUCLEAR ENTERPRISE , 2002, Health physics.

[39]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening , 1999, The Lancet.

[40]  O. Axelson,et al.  Residential radon exposure and lung cancer in Sweden. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  K C Young,et al.  Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[42]  J. Fraumeni,et al.  Lung Cancer after Treatment for Hodgkin's Disease: Focus on Radiation Effects , 2003, Radiation research.

[43]  John Eng,et al.  Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2003, JAMA.

[44]  York E Miller,et al.  Randomized controlled trial with low-dose spiral CT for lung cancer screening: feasibility study and preliminary results. , 2002, Radiology.

[45]  F. Fazio,et al.  Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results , 2003, The Lancet.