Comparison of Local and Global Optimization Methods for Calibration of a 3D Morphodynamic Model of a Curved Channel

In curved channels, the flow characteristics, sediment transport mechanisms, and bed evolution are more complex than in straight channels, owing to the interaction between the centrifugal force and the pressure gradient, which results in the formation of secondary currents. Therefore, using an appropriate numerical model that considers this fully three-dimensional effect, and subsequently, the model calibration are substantial tasks for achieving reliable simulation results. The calibration of numerical models as a subjective approach can become challenging and highly time-consuming, especially for inexperienced modelers, due to dealing with a large number of input parameters with respect to hydraulics and sediment transport. Using optimization methods can notably facilitate and expedite the calibration procedure by reducing the user intervention, which results in a more objective selection of parameters. This study focuses on the application of four different optimization algorithms for calibration of a 3D morphodynamic numerical model of a curved channel. The performance of a local gradient-based method is compared with three global optimization algorithms in terms of accuracy and computational time (model runs). The outputs of the optimization methods demonstrate similar sets of calibrated parameters and almost the same degree of accuracy according to the achieved minimum of the objective function. Accordingly, the most efficient method concerning the number of model runs (i.e., local optimization method) is selected for further investigation by setting up additional numerical models using different sediment transport formulae and various discharge rates. The comparisons of bed topography changes in several longitudinal and cross-sections between the measured data and the results of the calibrated numerical models are presented. The outcomes show an acceptable degree of accuracy for the automatically calibrated models.

[1]  Jean-Philippe Vidal,et al.  Towards a reasoned 1D river model calibration , 2005 .

[2]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[3]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[4]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models , 1994 .

[5]  Javed Iqbal,et al.  Understanding the DayCent model: Calibration, sensitivity, and identifiability through inverse modeling , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Stefan Haun,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical modelling of reservoir flushing in a prototype scale , 2012 .

[7]  Yafei Jia,et al.  Nonuniform sediment transport in alluvial rivers , 2000 .

[8]  Tew-Fik Mahdi,et al.  Flood modelling improvement using automatic calibration of two dimensional river software SRH-2D , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[9]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  A multistep automatic calibration scheme for river forecasting models , 2000 .

[10]  Andrew Binley,et al.  GLUE: 20 years on , 2014 .

[11]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Modelling guidelinesterminology and guiding principles , 2004 .

[12]  Van Rijn,et al.  Sediment transport; Part I, Bed load transport , 1984 .

[13]  T. Trucano,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Predictive Capability in Computational Engineering and Physics , 2004 .

[14]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  An efficient calibration method for continental‐scale land surface modeling , 2008 .

[15]  Stefan Haun,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical modelling of the flushing process of the Kali Gandaki hydropower reservoir , 2012 .

[16]  Tetsuya Sumi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of Free-Flow Sediment Flushing to Increase the Flushing Efficiency: A Case-Study Reservoir in Japan , 2017 .

[17]  Barbara Baginska,et al.  Modelling nutrient transport in Currency Creek, NSW with AnnAGNPS and PEST , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Christopher Conrad,et al.  Inverse Parametrization of a Regional Groundwater Flow Model with the Aid of Modelling and GIS: Test and Application of Different Approaches , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[19]  Robert G. Sargent,et al.  Verification and validation of simulation models , 2013, Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference.

[20]  Christine A. Shoemaker,et al.  Comparison of function approximation, heuristic, and derivative‐based methods for automatic calibration of computationally expensive groundwater bioremediation models , 2005 .

[21]  Nils Rüther,et al.  Three-dimensional (3D) modeling of non-uniform sediment transport in a channel bend with unsteady flow , 2009 .

[22]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives , 2003 .

[23]  Howard S. Wheater,et al.  Estimation and propagation of parametric uncertainty in environmental models , 2002 .

[24]  Jean-Philippe Vidal,et al.  River model calibration, from guidelines to operational support tools , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[26]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[27]  Stefan Haun,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical modeling of hydraulics and morphodynamics of the Schwarzenbach reservoir , 2018 .

[28]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[29]  János D. Pintér,et al.  Automatic model calibration applying global optimization techniques , 1998 .

[30]  Michael Rode,et al.  Multi-objective calibration of a river water quality model—Information content of calibration data , 2007 .

[31]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[32]  Robert V. Thomann,et al.  THE FUTURE "GOLDEN AGE" OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR SURFACE WATER QUALITY AND ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT , 1998 .

[33]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model , 2005 .

[34]  Tew-Fik Mahdi,et al.  Automatic calibration tool for river models based on the MHYSER software , 2010 .

[35]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[36]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and validation benchmarks , 2008 .

[37]  Selahattin Kocaman,et al.  A multi-parameter calibration method for the numerical simulation of morphodynamic problems , 2017 .

[38]  N. Olsen,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Flow Over Trapezoidal Broad-Crested Weir , 2011 .

[39]  Tew-Fik Mahdi,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional flood propagation models: SRH-2D and Hydro_AS-2D , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[40]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization , 1993 .

[41]  A. M. Wasantha Lal,et al.  Calibration of Riverbed Roughness , 1995 .

[42]  N. Olsen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Modeling of Sediment Transport in a Narrow 90° Channel Bend , 2005 .

[43]  D. J. Booker,et al.  Hydraulic modelling of fish habitat in urban rivers during high flows , 2003 .

[44]  Fausto A. Canales,et al.  River Model Calibration Based on Design of Experiments Theory. A Case Study: Meta River, Colombia , 2019, Water.

[45]  Karim C. Abbaspour,et al.  Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic parameters using ant colony optimization , 2001 .

[46]  N FienenMichael,et al.  Understanding the DayCent model , 2015 .

[47]  A. Bahremand,et al.  Distributed Hydrological Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis in Torysa Watershed, Slovakia , 2008 .

[48]  P. Botterweg,et al.  The user's influence on model calibration results: an example of the model SOIL, independently calibrated by two users , 1995 .

[49]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL , 1992 .

[50]  Chin-lien Yen,et al.  Bed Topography and Sediment Sorting in Channel Bend with Unsteady Flow , 1995 .

[51]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods , 2000 .

[52]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Surrogate modeling-based calibration of hydrodynamic river model parameters , 2018 .

[53]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[54]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Validation and error estimation of computational models , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[55]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[56]  Harald Kunstmann,et al.  Inverse distributed modelling of streamflow and turbulent fluxes: A sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic optimization , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[57]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. , 2000 .

[58]  B. Bates,et al.  A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Scheme for parameter estimation and inference in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modeling , 2001 .

[59]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Reducing the computational cost of automatic calibration through model preemption , 2010 .

[60]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models , 2002 .

[61]  Josef Schneider,et al.  Numerical analysis of synthetic granulate deposition in a physical model study , 2014 .

[62]  Heiko Apel,et al.  Towards automatic calibration of 2-D flood propagation models , 2010 .

[63]  N. Olsen Three-Dimensional CFD Modeling of Self-Forming Meandering Channel , 2003 .

[64]  Jean A. Cunge,et al.  Of data and models , 2003 .

[65]  Joby Boxall,et al.  Validation of a Three-Dimensional Numerical Code in the Simulation of Pseudo-Natural Meandering Flows , 2003 .

[66]  Catherine Wilson,et al.  3D numerical modelling of a willow vegetated river/floodplain system , 2006 .

[67]  W. Price Global optimization algorithms for a CAD workstation , 1987 .

[68]  Karel J. Keesman,et al.  Uncertainty propagation and speculation in projective forecasts of environmental change - a lake eutrophication example. , 1991 .

[69]  R. Ferguson,et al.  A Simple Universal Equation for Grain Settling Velocity , 2004 .

[70]  Stefan Haun,et al.  Three-dimensional measurements and numerical modelling of suspended sediments in a hydropower reservoir , 2013 .

[71]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .