The Engine Immobilizer: A Non-Starter for Car Thieves

We provide evidence for a beneficial welfare impact of a crime policy that is targeted at strenghtening victim precaution. Regulation made application of the electronic engine immobilizer, a simple and low-cost anti-theft device, mandatory for all new cars sold within the European Union as of 1998. We exploit the regulation as source of exogenous variation in use of the device by year of manufacture of cars. Based on detailed data at the level of car models, we find that uniform application of the security device reduced the probability of car theft by an estimated 50 percent on average in the Netherlands during 1995-2008, accounting for both the protective effect on cars with the device and the displacement effect on cars without the device. The costs per prevented theft equal some 1,500 Euro; a fraction of the social benefits of a prevented car theft.

[1]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[2]  C. Clotfelter.  Public Services, Private Substitutes, and the Demand for Protection against Crime , 1977 .

[3]  Simon T. Tidd,et al.  Willingness-to-Pay for Crime Control Programs , 2001 .

[4]  P. Cook,et al.  Economical Crime Control , 2010 .

[5]  Kate J. Bowers,et al.  Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluations * , 2009 .

[6]  M. Kolmar,et al.  The State’s Enforcement Monopoly and the Private Protection of Property , 2011 .

[7]  Erdal Tekin,et al.  Stand Your Ground Laws and Homicides , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Robert W. Helsley,et al.  Gated Communities and the Economic Geography of Crime , 1999 .

[9]  J. McCrary,et al.  Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs , 2011 .

[10]  Robert J. Meyer,et al.  Failing to learn from experience about catastrophes: The case of hurricane preparedness , 2012 .

[11]  Ivan P. L. Png,et al.  Private security: Deterrent or diversion? , 1994 .

[12]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Measuring Positive Externalities from Unobservable Victim Precaution: An Empirical Analysis of Lojack , 1997 .

[13]  R. Potter,et al.  ENGINE IMMOBILISERS: HOW EFFECTIVE ARE THEY? , 2001 .

[14]  S. Kriven,et al.  New Car Security and Shifting Vehicle Theft Patterns in Australia , 2007 .

[15]  Steven Shavell,et al.  Individual Precautions to Prevent Theft: Private Versus Socially Optimalbehavior , 1990 .

[16]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  UNDERSTANDING AND PREVENTING CAR THEFT , 2004 .

[17]  W. Strange,et al.  Mixed markets and crime , 2005 .

[18]  Jan C. van Ours,et al.  Does Regulation of Built-In Security Reduce Crime? Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 2010 .

[19]  Isaac Ehrlich,et al.  On the Usefulness of Controlling Individuals: An Economic Analysis of Rehabilitation, Incapacitation and Deterrence , 1981 .

[20]  L. Ronconi,et al.  The Effect of the Argentine Gun Buy-Back Program on Crime and Violence , 2010 .

[21]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Taking Care: Understanding and Encouraging Self-Protective Behavior , 2010 .

[22]  P. Cook,et al.  Public Safety Through Private Action: An Economic Assessment of BIDs , 2011 .

[23]  Tim Friehe,et al.  Private Protection Against Crime When Property Value is Private Information , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  Philip J. Cook,et al.  The Demand and Supply of Criminal Opportunities , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[25]  Andrew Leigh,et al.  Do Gun Buybacks Save Lives? Evidence from Panel Data , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  G. Lacroix,et al.  Private Protection against Crime , 1995 .

[27]  Barry Webb,et al.  STEERING COLUMN LOCKS AND MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT: EVALUATIONS FROM THREE COUNTRIES , 2006 .

[28]  Nick Tilley,et al.  The Crime Drop and the Security Hypothesis , 2011 .

[29]  A. Tseloni,et al.  The effectiveness of vehicle security devices and their role in the crime drop , 2011 .