Disentangling Gold Open Access

This chapter focuses on the analysis of current publication trends in gold Open Access (OA). The purpose of the chapter is to develop a full understanding on country patterns, OA journals characteristics and citation differences between gold OA and non-gold OA publications. For this, we will first review current literature regarding Open Access and its relation with its so-called citation advantage. Starting with a chronological perspective we will describe its development, how different countries are promoting OA publishing, and its effects on the journal publishing industry. We will deepen the analysis by investigating the research output produced by different units of analysis. First, we will focus on the production of countries with a special emphasis on citation and disciplinary differences. A point of interest will be identification of national idiosyncrasies and the relation between OA publication and research of local interest. This will lead to our second unit of analysis, OA journals indexed in Web of Science. Here we will deepen on journals characteristics and publisher types to clearly identify factors which may affect citation differences between OA and traditional journals which may not necessarily be derived from the OA factor. Gold OA publishing is being encouraged in many countries as opposed to Green OA. This chapter aims at fully understanding how it affects researchers' publication patterns and whether it ensures an alleged citation advantage as opposed to non-gold OA publications.

[1]  J. Bohannon Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone. , 2016, Science.

[2]  Iain D. Craig,et al.  Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: A critical review of the literature , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[3]  B. Björk,et al.  ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[4]  Alesia Zuccalá,et al.  The lay person and Open Access , 2009, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Lisa Gonzales Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. , 2017 .

[6]  Dalmeet Singh Chawla Unpaywall finds free versions of paywalled papers , 2017, Nature.

[7]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[8]  M. Wacha,et al.  The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles , 2017 .

[9]  Paul Ginsparg,et al.  Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv , 2009 .

[10]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline , 2012, ArXiv.

[11]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference? , 2016, Learn. Publ..

[13]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Why Researchers Publish in Non-Mainstream Journals: Training, Knowledge Bridging and Gap-Filling , 2017 .

[14]  R VanNoorden,et al.  Open Access: The True Cost of Science Publishing , 2013 .

[15]  B. Björk,et al.  The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Martin Vingron,et al.  A genome-wide transcriptional fingerprint of normal and malformed human hearts , 2003 .

[18]  Jeffrey Beall,et al.  The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access , 2013 .

[19]  Jeffrey Beall,et al.  Predatory publishers are corrupting open access , 2012, Nature.

[20]  B. Björk,et al.  Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[21]  P. Ginsparg Winners and Losers in the Global Research Village , 1997 .

[22]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Gold, green, and black open access , 2017, Learn. Publ..

[23]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  S. Harnad,et al.  Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals , 2004 .

[25]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[26]  David Jones,et al.  Costs, risks and benefits in improving access to journal articles , 2011, Learn. Publ..

[27]  Stacy Konkiel The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review , 2017 .

[28]  Anurag A Agrawal Four more reasons to be skeptical of open-access publishing. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[29]  Éric Archambault,et al.  Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996-2013 , 2014 .

[30]  Richard Van Noorden Half of 2011 papers now free to read , 2013, Nature.

[31]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Open Access Publishing and Citation Impact - An International Study , 2015, ISSI.

[32]  Rogério Mugnaini,et al.  International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI databases , 2006, Scientometrics.

[33]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The effect of "open access" on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  B. Björk,et al.  Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 , 2010, PloS one.

[35]  R. Cullen,et al.  Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms. , 2011 .

[36]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  The open access movement at a crossroad: Are the big publishers and academic social media taking over? , 2016, Learn. Publ..

[37]  J. Samulski,et al.  Who ’ s Afraid of Peer Review ? , 2009 .

[38]  Gianfranco Ennas,et al.  Features of top-rated gold open access journals: An analysis of the scopus database , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[39]  P. Ginsparg,et al.  Who Should Own Scientific Papers? , 1998, Science.

[40]  Richard van Hillegersberg Open access: The true cost of science publishing. , 2013 .

[41]  J. Whitfield Elsevier boycott gathers pace , 2012, Nature.

[42]  Joseph J. Esposito The devil you don't know: The unexpected future of Open Access publishing , 2004, First Monday.

[43]  P. Willett,et al.  Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile , 2016, PLoS ONE.

[44]  Tove Faber Frandsen The effects of open access on un-published documents: A case study of economics working papers , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[45]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[46]  Christian Gumpenberger,et al.  On the impact of Gold Open Access journals , 2013, Scientometrics.

[47]  G. Eysenbach The Open Access Advantage , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[48]  Peter Suber,et al.  Open access, impact, and demand , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[49]  Alma Swan,et al.  The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date , 2010 .

[50]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles , 2018, PeerJ.

[52]  Jingfeng Xia,et al.  Who publishes in “predatory” journals? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  Elena Giglia The impact factor of open access journals: data and trends , 2010, ELPUB.

[54]  P. Molnár Guerilla Open Access Manifesto , 2014 .

[55]  B. Björk,et al.  Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[56]  Walt Crawford Free electronic refereed journals: getting past the arc of enthusiasm , 2002, Learn. Publ..

[57]  Peter Suber Removing the Barriers to Research: An Introduction to Open Access for Librarians , 2003 .

[58]  Paul Ginsparg As We May Read , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Peter Suber,et al.  Gratis and libre open access , 2008 .

[60]  Bo-Christer Björk Open access subject repositories: An overview , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[61]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update , 2008 .

[62]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators , 2019, Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators.

[63]  Frederick J. Friend Big Deal — good deal? Or is there a better deal? , 2003, Learn. Publ..

[64]  Tim Brody,et al.  5 – The impact loss to authors and research , 2006 .

[65]  C. MacCallum Why ONE Is More Than 5 , 2011, PLoS Biology.

[66]  Isidro F. Aguillo,et al.  Bibliometric and benchmark analysis of gold Open Access in Spain: big output and little impact , 2016 .