Housing system and laying hen strain impacts on egg microbiology.

Alternative hen housing is becoming more commonplace in the egg market. However, a complete understanding of the implications for alternative housing systems on egg safety has not been achieved. The current study examines the impact of housing Hy-Line Brown, Hy-Line Silver Brown, and Barred Plymouth Rock hens in conventional cage, cage-free, and free range egg production systems on shell microbiology. Eggs were collected at 4 sampling periods. Egg shell emulsion pools were formed and enumerated for total aerobic organisms, Enterobacteriaceae, and yeast and mold counts. Hy-Line Brown and Hy-Line Silver Brown hens produced eggs with significantly (P < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively) different levels of aerobic organisms dependent on housing system. Eggs from conventional cages had significantly different (P < 0.05) levels of aerobic contamination in relation to hen strain with Hy-Line Silver Brown having the greatest (4.57 log cfu/mL). Hy-Line Brown and Barred Plymouth Rock hens produced eggs with significantly different (P < 0.01) levels of Enterobacteriaceae among housing systems with conventional caged eggs having the lowest level of contamination for the hen strains. There were no differences within each strain among housing systems for yeast and mold contamination. The study shows that hen strain has an effect on egg microbial levels for various housing systems, and egg safety should be considered when making hen strain selections for each housing system.

[1]  K. Cheng,et al.  Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. , 2009, Poultry science.

[2]  M. Uyttendaele,et al.  Bacterial shell contamination in the egg collection chains of different housing systems for laying hens , 2006, British poultry science.

[3]  J. Northcutt,et al.  Recovery of Salmonella from commercial shell eggs by shell rinse and shell crush methodologies. , 2005, Poultry science.

[4]  M. Uyttendaele,et al.  Bacterial eggshell contamination in conventional cages, furnished cages and aviary housing systems for laying hens , 2005, British poultry science.

[5]  J. Bauer,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Antibiotic Resistance Characteristics of Gram‐negative Bacteria Isolated from Laying Hens and Eggs in Conventional and Organic Keeping Systems in Bavaria, Germany , 2008, Zoonoses and public health.

[6]  B. Sonck,et al.  Bacteriological contamination, dirt, and cracks of eggshells in furnished cages and noncage systems for laying hens: an international on-farm comparison. , 2009, Poultry science.

[7]  Y. Nys,et al.  Comparison of eggshell hygiene in two housing systems: Standard and furnished cages , 2006, British poultry science.

[8]  Deana R. Jones,et al.  The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. , 2011, Poultry science.

[9]  Prevention of Salmonella enteritidis in shell eggs during production, storage, and transportation. Final rule. , 2009, Federal register.

[10]  A. Huneau-Salaün,et al.  Risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica contamination in 519 French laying hen flocks at the end of the laying period. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[11]  Deana R. Jones,et al.  Prevalence of coliforms, Salmonella, Listeria, and Campylobacter associated with eggs and the environment of conventional cage and free-range egg production. , 2012, Poultry science.

[12]  K. Anderson,et al.  Comparison of environmental and egg microbiology associated with conventional and free-range laying hen management. , 2011, Poultry science.

[13]  M. Uyttendaele,et al.  Bacterial contamination of table eggs and the influence of housing systems , 2008 .