Understanding the influence of multiple levels of governments on the development of inter-organizational systems

In the arena of international trade, multiple levels of governments (ranging from national to supranational) play an important role in regulating and controlling cross-border trade activities. Recently, they have also become powerful players in influencing decisions about inter-organizational systems (IOS). The influences of these multiple levels of governments on IOS are of an enormous scale and impact on businesses and national economies. Understanding them is a prerequisite for informed actions. From a theoretical point of view we contribute with the MLxMC framework, a conceptual framework, which combines a processual, multi-level approach with the motors of change. We use the MLxMC framework to explicitly highlight the influences of multiple levels of governments on IOS developments that take place in the highly regulated environment of international trade. We demonstrate how the framework can be applied to analyze such developments, extending the existing IOS research with models that explicitly acknowledge the role of government. The framework makes use of multi-level analysis by taking the political and institutional aspects into account. As an analytical tool, the framework can support business practitioners as well as policy-makers in their strategic choices of which level to engage at and with whom to collaborate in order to influence the debate.

[1]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[2]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  The Limits of an Ostrich Policy for Resolving Dialectical Conflicts , 2007, Bled eConference.

[3]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[4]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[5]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  A theory of industry-level activity for understanding the adoption of interorganizational systems , 2000, ECIS.

[6]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Contours of diffusion of electronic data interchange in Finland: Overcoming technological barriers and collaborating to make it happen , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Triple Take on Information System Implementation , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Jonathan Paul Marshall,et al.  Information Technology, Disruption and Disorder: Australian Customs and IT. , 2009 .

[9]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[10]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[11]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  A Collective Action Perspective on Technological Innovation in Business/Government Networks , 2007, ECIS.

[12]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[13]  A. Pettigrew Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[14]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Organizational Transformation Using Electronic Data Interchange: The Case of TradeNet in Singapore , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[16]  Anna Sidorova,et al.  Understanding Business Process Change Failure: An Actor-Network Perspective , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[18]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .

[19]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[20]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  International Trade at the Speed of Light: Building an Electronic Trading Infrastructure in Denmark, Finland and Hong Kong , 1998 .

[21]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  Re-organising government using IT: The Danish model , 2007 .

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  H. Henriksen Performance, pressures, and politics: motivators for adoption of interorganizational information systems , 2002 .

[24]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Information Technology for Adoption and Intelligent Design for e-Government (ITAIDE) , 2006 .

[25]  Benjamin L. Schooley,et al.  Towards end-to-end government performance management: Case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS) , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  The Streamlining of Cross-Border Taxation Using IT: The Danish eExport Solutuon , 2007 .

[27]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Michael R. Vitale,et al.  Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information Systems , 1988, MIS Q..

[29]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Inter-organizational network formation and sense-making: Initiation and management of public-private collaboration , 2007 .

[30]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[31]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Developing an Understanding of Interorganizational Systems: Arguments for Multi-Level Analysis and Structuration Theory , 2000, ECIS.

[32]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[34]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  Implementing enterprise content management: from evolution through strategy to contradictions out-of-the-box , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Dual-Motor, Constructive Process Model of Organizational Transition , 2004 .

[38]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.