Virtuality, Technology Use, and Engagement Within Organizations

Multinational organizations are turning to collaborative technology to enable virtual organizational structures. While collaborative technology provides distributed workers with new affordances to form relationships and share knowledge, collaborative technology also has complex, interwoven implications for virtual organizing. To disentangle these concerns, this study considers four key dimensions of virtuality—spatial dispersion, temporal dispersion, dynamic structure, and functional diversity—in relation to technology use and engagement with peers within an organization. Survey data were collected in a multinational organization that facilitates work through extensive use of collaborative technology. The results of structural equation modeling reveal connections between two dimensions of virtuality, use of collaborative technology and peer engagement in the organization. Findings suggest that understanding interactions in virtual organizations requires a more nuanced approach to virtuality and active management of technology implementation. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that managers need to actively manage the deployment of new collaborative technology by focusing on specific characteristics of work groups.

[1]  J. Oakley,et al.  Leadership Processes in Virtual Teams and Organizations , 1999 .

[2]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Communication technology use and multiple workplace identifications among organizational teleworkers with varied degrees of virtuality , 1999 .

[3]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory , 1993 .

[4]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The Place of Face-to-Face Communication in Distributed Work , 2002 .

[5]  Kathryn L. Fonner,et al.  Why Teleworkers are More Satisfied with Their Jobs than are Office-Based Workers: When Less Contact is Beneficial , 2010 .

[6]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[7]  R. Rajala,et al.  Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries , 2011 .

[8]  Linda Askenäs,et al.  Wiki collaboration in organizations: an explorartory study , 2011, ECIS.

[9]  B. Muthén,et al.  Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models , 1977 .

[10]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Time Separation, Coordination, and Performance in Technical Teams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  Børge Obel,et al.  Embedding Virtuality into Organization Design Theory: Virtuality and Its Information Processing Consequences , 2009 .

[12]  Jenny M. Hoobler,et al.  Employee Turnover and Tacit Knowledge Diffusion: A Network Perspective , 2003 .

[13]  Saonee Sarker,et al.  The Role of Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams: A Social Network Perspective , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  J. Pearl,et al.  EIGHT MYTHS ABOUT CAUSALITY AND STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 2013 .

[15]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[16]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[17]  Bernhard R. Katzy,et al.  Design and implementation of virtual organizations , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[19]  S. Krishna,et al.  Social computing implications for technology usage and team interactions in virtual teams , 2011, 7th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom).

[20]  Deborah L. Duarte,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams , 2000 .

[21]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[22]  Kenneth L. Bettenhausen,et al.  Realities of Working in Virtual Teams: Affective and Attitudinal Outcomes of Using Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009 .

[23]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[25]  K. Campbell,et al.  Name generators in surveys of personal networks , 1991 .

[26]  K. Bollen.  A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models , 1989 .

[27]  Rosta Farzan,et al.  Spreading the honey: a system for maintaining an online community , 2009, GROUP '09.

[28]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[29]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[30]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Where Global and Virtual Meet: The Value of Examining the Intersection of These Elements in Twenty-First-Century Teams , 2014 .

[31]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[32]  M. Huysman,et al.  Keeping the Wheels Turning: The Dynamics of Managing Networks of Practice , 2010 .

[33]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  How virtual teams use their virtual workspace to coordinate knowledge , 2012, TMIS.

[34]  D. Robey,et al.  Going Global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization , 1998 .

[35]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[36]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Information and Communication Technology Use in Organizations , 2012 .

[37]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Global organizational communities of practice: The effects of nationality diversity, psychological safety, and media richness on community performance , 2013 .

[38]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[41]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness , 2003 .

[42]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[43]  S. Morgan.  Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research , 2013 .

[44]  R. Rice,et al.  An Integrated Model of Knowledge Sharing in Contemporary Communication Environments , 2009 .

[45]  Leslie A. Hayduk.  Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advances , 1987 .

[46]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  FOSTERING INTRANET KNOWLEDGE- SHARING: AN INTEGRATION OF TRANSACTIVE MEMORY AND PUBLIC GOODS APPROACHES , 2001 .

[47]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[48]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Reconceptualizing Virtual Teaming from a Constitutive Perspective Review, Redirection, and Research Agenda , 2008 .

[49]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[50]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing , 1999 .

[51]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Virtually Working: Communicative and Structural Predictors of Media Use and Key Outcomes in Virtual Work Teams , 2006 .

[52]  C. Saunders,et al.  My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams , 2004 .

[53]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[54]  Bonnie A. Nardi and Steve Whittaker.  The Place of Face-to-Face Communication in Distributed Work , 2002 .

[55]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Joseph T. Banas,et al.  Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects , 2002 .

[57]  G. Labianca,et al.  Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties , 2004 .

[58]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Crossing Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Globally Distributed Projects: A Relational Model of Coordination Delay , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  H. Marsh,et al.  The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: non-normal data and small sample sizes. , 2004, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[60]  Yuhyung Shin,et al.  Conflict Resolution in Virtual Teams , 2005 .

[61]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[62]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[63]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[64]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[65]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Perceived Networks, Activity Foci, and Observable Communication in Social Collectives , 1994 .

[66]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[67]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[68]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[69]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Situated Knowledge and Learning in Dispersed Teams , 2002 .

[70]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[71]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The Connectivity Paradox: Using Technology to Both Decrease and Increase Perceptions of Distance in Distributed Work Arrangements , 2010 .

[72]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  A Procedure for Surveying Personal Networks , 1978 .

[73]  Stevie Gorman,et al.  A Model of Perceived Communication in Collective Networks. , 1990 .

[74]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[75]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  Decision supporting functionality in a virtual enterprise network , 2000, Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA'05).

[76]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[77]  Jaehee Cho,et al.  The Rate and Delay in Overload: An Investigation of Communication Overload and Channel Synchronicity on Identification and Job Satisfaction , 2011 .

[78]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[79]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Corporate culture, absorptive capacity and IT success , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[80]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning , 2012, Inf. Manag..

[81]  José J. M. Sampaio.  Virtual Teams@Work , 2010 .

[82]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[83]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .