Effects of identical example-problem and problem-example pairs on learning

Examples are often an integral part of online learning environments directed at the acquisition of problem-solving skills. An unresolved issue, however, is when examples should be provided to learners. Prior research has suggested that example-problem pairs are more effective than problem-example pairs for novice learners. However, in those studies, the problem-example pairs condition may have been hindered by the fact that the examples and problems were not identical within and across pairs. The present experiment therefore employed a between-subjects design with two conditions to compare the effects of learning to solve one particular problem from studying/practicing either in an example-problem-example-problem sequence (EP condition; n = 16) or in a problem-example-problem-example sequence (PE condition; n = 16). Results show that participants in the EP condition outperformed their counterparts in the PE condition during the learning phase, but that this difference had disappeared on the test tasks after participants in the PE group had also studied the example a second time.

[1]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Computer-supported example-based learning: When instructional explanations reduce self-explanations , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[2]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[3]  J. Sweller,et al.  Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. , 1987 .

[4]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[5]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Instruktionale Effekte einer kombinierten Lernmethode , 2000 .

[6]  J. Sweller,et al.  Learning to Solve Compare Word Problems: The Effect of Example Format and Generating Self-Explanations , 1998 .

[7]  T. Gog,et al.  Example-Based Learning: Integrating Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Research Perspectives , 2010 .

[8]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. , 2001 .

[10]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  When and how often should worked examples be given to students? New results and a summary of the current state of research , 2008 .

[11]  T. Gog,et al.  Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices learning , 2011 .

[12]  John Sweller,et al.  The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognise designers' styles , 2009 .

[13]  S. Derry,et al.  Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research , 2000 .

[14]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  The effects of feedback protocol on self-regulated learning in a web-based worked example learning environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Encountering the expertise reversal effect with a computer-based environment on electrical circuit analysis , 2006 .

[16]  William M. Carroll.  Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. , 1994 .

[17]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Instruktionale Effekte einer kombinierten Lernmethode: Zahlt sich die Kombination von Lösungsbeispielen und Problemlöseaufgaben aus? , 1999 .

[18]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Are Self-explaining and Coached Problem Solving More Effective When Done by Pairs of Students Than Alone? , 2008, 0805.4223.

[19]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Attention guidance during example study via the model's eye movements , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .