Effect of Data Time Interval on Real-time Flood Forecasting

Rainfall–runoff is a complicated nonlinear process and many data mining tools have demonstrated their powerful potential in its modelling but still there are many unsolved problems. This paper addresses a mostly ignored area in hydrological modelling: data time interval for models. Modern data collection and telecommunication technologies can provide us with very high resolution data with extremely fine sampling intervals. We hypothesise that both too large and too small time intervals would be detrimental to a model’s performance, which has been illustrated in the case study. It has been found that there is an optimal time interval which is different from the original data time interval (i.e. the measurement time interval). It has been found that the data time interval does have a major impact on the model’s performance, which is more prominent for longer lead times than for shorter ones. This is highly relevant to flood forecasting since a flood modeller usually tries to stretch his/her model’s lead time as far as possible. If the selection of data time interval is not considered, the model developed will not be performing at its full potential. The application of the Gamma Test and Information Entropy introduced in this paper may help the readers to speed up their data input selection process.

[1]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches , 2008 .

[2]  Nenad Koncar,et al.  A note on the Gamma test , 1997, Neural Computing & Applications.

[3]  Vujica Yevjevich,et al.  Transfer of hydrologic information among river points , 1987 .

[4]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed , 1994 .

[5]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Efficient selection of inputs for artificial neural network models , 2005 .

[6]  Dawei Han,et al.  Evaporation Estimation Using Artificial Neural Networks and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Techniques , 2009 .

[7]  Dawei Han,et al.  Flood forecasting using support vector machines , 2007 .

[8]  A. Roli.  Artificial Neural Networks , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Dawei Han,et al.  Closure to "Daily Pan Evaporation Modeling in a Hot and Dry Climate" , 2009 .

[10]  Yen-Ming Chiang,et al.  A two‐step‐ahead recurrent neural network for stream‐flow forecasting , 2004 .

[11]  Jamshid Piri,et al.  Comparison of LLR, MLP, Elman, NNARX and ANFIS Models―with a case study in solar radiation estimation , 2009 .

[12]  Dawei Han,et al.  Fluvial Flood Forecasting , 2000 .

[13]  Donald H. Burn,et al.  An entropy approach to data collection network design , 1994 .

[14]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Flow prediction by three back propagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data , 2005 .

[15]  N. Null.  Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. I: Preliminary Concepts , 2000 .

[16]  J. Amorocho,et al.  Entropy in the assessment of uncertainty in hydrologic systems and models , 1973 .

[17]  Mohcine Zouak,et al.  A comparison of linear and neural network ARX models applied to a prediction of the indoor temperature of a building , 2004, Neural Computing & Applications.

[18]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[19]  Yen-Ming Chiang,et al.  Multi-step-ahead neural networks for flood forecasting , 2007 .

[20]  Jonathan Lawry,et al.  River Flow Modelling Using Fuzzy Decision Trees , 2002 .

[21]  Takeo Maruyama,et al.  Evaluation of Rainfall Characteristics Using Entropy , 1998 .

[22]  A. J. Jones,et al.  A proof of the Gamma test , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Emin Avcı,et al.  Forecasting Daily and Sessional Returns of the ISE - 100 Index with Neural Network Models , 2007 .

[24]  M. Y. El-Bakry.  Feed forward neural networks modeling for K-P interactions , 2003 .

[25]  Simon Li,et al.  Uncertainties in real‐time flood forecasting with neural networks , 2007 .

[26]  Gokmen Tayfur,et al.  Artificial neural networks for estimating daily total suspended sediment in natural streams , 2006 .

[27]  J W Clark,et al.  Neural network modelling , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  Entropy as a measure of hydrologic data uncertainty and model performance , 1986 .

[29]  Robert M. Pap,et al.  Handbook of neural computing applications , 1990 .

[30]  K. P. Sudheer,et al.  Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models , 2004 .

[31]  Robert J. Abrahart,et al.  Neural network modelling of non-linear hydrological relationships , 2007 .

[32]  D. Kumar,et al.  Evaporation Estimation Using Artificial Neural Networks and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Techniques , 2012 .

[33]  A. Shamseldin.  Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modelling , 1997 .

[34]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Seasonal to interannual rainfall probabilistic forecasts for improved water supply management: Part 1 — A strategy for system predictor identification , 2000 .

[35]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[36]  William F. Caselton,et al.  Hydrologic Networks: Information Transmission , 1980 .

[37]  Dawei Han,et al.  Identification of Support Vector Machines for Runoff Modelling , 2004 .

[38]  Jimson Mathew,et al.  Runoff prediction using an integrated hybrid modelling scheme , 2009 .

[39]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Evaluation of rainfall networks using entropy: I. Theoretical development , 1992 .

[40]  Dawei Han,et al.  Model data selection using gamma test for daily solar radiation estimation , 2008 .

[41]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .