The Relationship of Promotion Focus, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Categorical Accessibility in American and Hong Kong Chinese University Students

Categorical accessibility is a cognitive factor that limits the extent of creative conceptual expansion. In the present study, we sought to establish the categorical accessibility norms in five conceptual domains among American and Hong Kong Chinese university students. In addition, we predicted that the tendency to access normatively inaccessible exemplars in a conceptual domain is positively related to the motivation to maximize the likelihood of attaining positive outcomes (promotion focus) and negatively related to the need for cognitive closure. We obtained the predicted relationships among both American and Hong Kong Chinese university students. These findings were discussed in terms of their implications for promoting creativity across cultures.

[1]  T. B. Ward.  Structured Imagination: the Role of Category Structure in Exemplar Generation , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[4]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. , 1997 .

[5]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Creative functioning of monolingual and bilingual children in Singapore. , 1970 .

[6]  L. Barsalou.  Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  E. Higgins,et al.  Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Chi-yue Chiu,et al.  Effects of Novel Conceptual Combination on Creativity. , 2002 .

[9]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  Tosh Demands and Generative Thinking: What Changes and What Remains the Same? , 1997 .

[11]  C. Chiu,et al.  The Motivational Function of Regulatory Focus in Creativity , 2002 .

[12]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology. , 1990 .

[13]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  T. Menon,et al.  Motivated cultural cognition: the impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  R. Friedman,et al.  The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Emergent attributes in combined concepts. , 1997 .

[17]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought , 2002, Memory & cognition.