Managing Active Learning Processes in Large First Year Physics Classes: The Advantages of an Integrated Approach

Turning lectures into interactive, student-led question and answer sessions is known to increase learning, but enabling interaction in a large class seems an insurmountable task. This can discourage adoption of this new approach – who has time to individualize responses, address questions from over 200 students and encourage active participation in class? An approach adopted by a teaching team in large first-year classes at a research-intensive university appears to provide a means to do so. We describe the implementation of active learning strategies in a large first-year undergraduate physics unit of study, replacing traditional, content-heavy lectures with an integrated approach to question-driven learning. A key feature of our approach is that it facilitates intensive in-class discussions by requiring students to engage in preparatory reading and answer short written quizzes before every class. The lecturer uses software to rapidly analyze the student responses and identify the main issues faced by the students before the start of each class. We report the success of the integration of student preparation with this analysis and feedback framework, and the impact on the in-class discussions. We also address some of the difficulties commonly experienced by staff preparing for active learning classes.

[1]  Louis Deslauriers,et al.  Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class , 2011, Science.

[2]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[3]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[4]  George D. Kuh High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter , 2008 .

[5]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[6]  Michael Harris,et al.  Leading the Learner-Centered Campus: An Administrator's Framework for Improving Student Learning Outcomes , 2010 .

[7]  D. Sokoloff,et al.  Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment , 1997 .

[8]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry , 2007 .

[9]  C. Wieman,et al.  Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions , 2009 .

[10]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[11]  Ann E. Austin,et al.  Rethinking Faculty Work: Higher Education's Strategic Imperative , 2007 .

[12]  D. Rutledge,et al.  Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations. , 2004, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[13]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[14]  Ray Land,et al.  Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge , 2013 .

[15]  K. Bruffee Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1995 .

[16]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[17]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[18]  Ian D. Beatty,et al.  Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching , 2005, physics/0508114.

[19]  Kenneth A. Bruffee,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1999 .

[20]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture , 2002 .

[21]  Deanne Gannaway,et al.  Strategies for effective dissemination of the outcomes of teaching and learning projects , 2010 .

[22]  Elizabeth J. Whitt,et al.  Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter , 2012 .

[23]  David A. Banks,et al.  Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. , 2006 .

[24]  R. Beichner The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2007 .

[25]  Matthew A. Kohlmyer,et al.  Publisher's Note: Tale of two curricula: The performance of 2000 students in introductory electromagnetism [Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 5, 020105 (2009)] , 2009 .

[26]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  A Tale of Two Curricula: The performance of two thousand students in introductory electromagnetism , 2009, 0906.0022.

[27]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[28]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension , 1981 .

[29]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[30]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[31]  Thomas A. Angelo,et al.  Classroom assessment techniques : a handbook for collegeteachers / Thomas A. Angelo, K. Patricia Cross , 1993 .

[32]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  Class size and student performance: 1984–94 , 1996 .

[33]  S. Pollock Longitudinal study of student conceptual understanding in electricity and magnetism , 2009, 0907.5597.

[34]  Shirley Alexander,et al.  Dissemination, adoption and adaptation of project innovations in higher education , 2005 .

[35]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  QUESTION DRIVEN INSTRUCTION: TEACHING SCIENCE (WELL) WITH AN AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEM , 2005 .

[36]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Resource Letter ALIP-1: Active-Learning Instruction in Physics , 2012 .

[37]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual , 1999 .

[38]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Classroom Assessment Techniques , 1993 .

[39]  J. Elizabeth,et al.  Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter , 2012 .

[40]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[41]  G. Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by Design , 1998 .

[42]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..