The Effectiveness and Safety of Rectal Modular Resection in Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Described by Heald in 1982, total mesorectal excision (TME) is now routinely performed as the standard procedure for mid-low rectal cancer, with remarkable decrease in local recurrence and improved oncology outcome. However, the integrity of the resected mesentery and damage to autonomic nerves still remain challenging for general surgeons, especially in the cohort of neoadjuvant therapy patients. The concept of rectal modular resection (RMR), based on an integral understanding of the regional anatomy, was proposed as a surgical skill for dissociation of the rectum with shorter surgical duration, function preservation, and improved oncology outcome. Methods: This was a retrospective trial. Patients with resectable rectal lesions, ranging between 3 and 7 cm from the anal verge, were enrolled and grouped by TME surgery based on RMR or classical procedure resection (CPR). We estimated perioperative outcomes, including surgery complications such as anastomotic leak, urine retention, and others. Pathological properties, including distal clearance, harvested lymph nodes, tumor differentiation, and specimen grading, were also taken into account. Patients were followed postoperatively and functional evaluation was recorded at the 3-month and 1-year postoperation visits. Results: From January 2019 to December 2021, a total of 92 patients were enrolled in this study. TME surgery complying with the RMR methodology was performed with a back-to-bilateral-to-front modular proceeding. Duration of operation was significantly shortened in the RMR group, without increase in blood loss or failure rate of anus preservation. The quality of the specimen, graded according to integrity of the mesorectum, stands out in the RMR group. Functional evaluation revealed no statistical difference between RMR and CPR groups regarding sexual ability impairment and defecation disorder since follow-up is still ongoing. Conclusions: RMR-based TME was efficient with compressed operation duration compared with CPR and its safety was well validated with regard to the occurrence of complications and function loss.

[1]  Huihong Jiang,et al.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with urogenital fascia preservation for mid-low rectal cancer: Anatomical basis and clinical effect - Experimental research. , 2022, International journal of surgery.

[2]  A. Heriot,et al.  The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review , 2021, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  Masaaki Ito,et al.  Essential anatomy for total mesorectal excision and lateral lymph node dissection, in both trans-abdominal and trans-anal perspective. , 2020, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[5]  Guanyu Yu,et al.  Review of Denonvilliers’ fascia: the controversies and consensuses , 2020, Gastroenterology report.

[6]  D. Keller,et al.  Total Mesorectal Excision Technique—Past, Present, and Future , 2020, Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.

[7]  Hongbo Wei,et al.  Identification of the surgical indication line for the Denonvilliers’ fascia and its anatomy in patients with rectal cancer , 2020, Cancer communications.

[8]  P. Chapuis,et al.  Rectal mobilization: the place of Denonvilliers' fascia and inconsistencies in the literature , 2016, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[9]  Yi Li,et al.  A Review of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer , 2016, International journal of biological sciences.

[10]  D. Magee,et al.  Understanding the surgical pitfalls in total mesorectal excision: Investigating the histology of the perirectal fascia and the pelvic autonomic nerves. , 2015, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  M. R. Rodríguez-Luna,et al.  Total Mesorectal Excision, an erroneous anatomical term for the gold standard in rectal cancer treatment. , 2015, International journal of surgery.

[12]  M. Büchler,et al.  Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. , 2010, Surgery.

[13]  C. Marijnen,et al.  Urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment is mainly caused by surgery , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  M. Konerding,et al.  How to Optimize Autonomic Nerve Preservation in Total Mesorectal Excision: Clinical Topography and Morphology of Pelvic Nerves and Fasciae , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[15]  G. Murakami,et al.  Histological identification of fascial structures posterolateral to the rectum , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[17]  J. Drebin,et al.  Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. , 2003, Surgery.

[18]  J. Saric,et al.  Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer , 2003, The British journal of surgery.