Digital microfluidics for time-resolved cytotoxicity studies on single non-adherent yeast cells.

Single cell analysis (SCA) has gained increased popularity for elucidating cellular heterogeneity at genomic, proteomic and cellular levels. Flow cytometry is considered as one of the most widely used techniques to characterize single cell responses; however, its inability to analyse cells with spatio-temporal resolution poses a major drawback. Here, we introduce a digital microfluidic (DMF) platform as a useful tool for conducting studies on isolated yeast cells in a high-throughput fashion. The reported system exhibits (i) a microwell array for trapping single non-adherent cells by shuttling a cell-containing droplet over the array, and allows (ii) implementation of high-throughput cytotoxicity assays with enhanced spatio-temporal resolution. The system was tested for five different concentrations of the antifungal drug Amphotericin B, and the cell responses were monitored over time by time lapse fluorescence microscopy. The DMF platform was validated by bulk experiments, which mimicked the DMF experimental design. A correlation analysis revealed that the results obtained on the DMF platform are not significantly different from those obtained in bulk; hence, the DMF platform can be used as a tool to perform SCA on non-adherent cells, with spatio-temporal resolution. In addition, no external forces, other than the physical forces generated by moving the droplet, were used to capture single cells, thereby avoiding cell damage. As such, the information on cellular behaviour during treatment could be obtained for every single cell over time making this platform noteworthy in the field of SCA.

[1]  Hakho Lee,et al.  Micromanipulation of biological systems with microelectromagnets , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text. , 1996 .

[3]  David Collett.  Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research , 1994 .

[4]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Single-cell enzyme concentrations, kinetics, and inhibition analysis using high-density hydrodynamic cell isolation arrays. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Y. Zhan,et al.  Characterizing osmotic lysis kinetics under microfluidic hydrodynamic focusing for erythrocyte fragility studies. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[6]  S. Elmore.  Apoptosis: A Review of Programmed Cell Death , 2007, Toxicologic pathology.

[7]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[8]  Mattias Goksör,et al.  Optical tweezers applied to a microfluidic system. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Howard A Stone,et al.  Mechanism for clogging of microchannels. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Doryaneh Ahmadpour,et al.  Hydrodynamic Cell Trapping for High Throughput Single-Cell Applications , 2013, Micromachines.

[11]  D. Collett.  Modelling survival data , 1994 .

[12]  Robert Puers,et al.  Digital microfluidics-enabled single-molecule detection by printing and sealing single magnetic beads in femtoliter droplets. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[13]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  All electronic approach for high-throughput cell trapping and lysis with electrical impedance monitoring. , 2014, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[14]  Daniel S. Palacios,et al.  Amphotericin primarily kills yeast by simply binding ergosterol , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Laurell,et al.  Review of cell and particle trapping in microfluidic systems. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[16]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[17]  J. Voldman,et al.  Holding forces of single-particle dielectrophoretic traps. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[18]  I. Sudbery,et al.  Apoptosis induced by environmental stresses and amphotericin B in Candida albicans , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Aaron R Wheeler,et al.  Microfluidic device for single-cell analysis. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  Morillon,et al.  Osmotic water permeability of isolated protoplasts. Modifications during development , 1999, Plant physiology.

[21]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Microfluidic single-cell array cytometry for the analysis of tumor apoptosis. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  Mengsu Yang,et al.  Cell docking and on-chip monitoring of cellular reactions with a controlled concentration gradient on a microfluidic device. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  Soo Hyeon Kim,et al.  Electroactive microwell arrays for highly efficient single-cell trapping and analysis. , 2011, Small.

[24]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Microfluidic high-throughput culturing of single cells for selection based on extracellular metabolite production or consumption , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Won Gu Lee,et al.  Cell manipulation in microfluidics , 2013, Biofabrication.

[26]  C. Hansen,et al.  Microfluidic single cell analysis: from promise to practice. , 2012, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[27]  X. Gidrol,et al.  An EWOD-based microfluidic chip for single-cell isolation, mRNA purification and subsequent multiplex qPCR. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[28]  Steve C. C. Shih,et al.  A droplet-to-digital (D2D) microfluidic device for single cell assays. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[29]  Dong Sun,et al.  Enhanced cell sorting and manipulation with combined optical tweezer and microfluidic chip technologies. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[30]  L. Bergman,et al.  Growth and maintenance of yeast. , 2001, Methods in molecular biology.

[31]  Carlo Riccardi,et al.  Analysis of apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[32]  Ling Yu,et al.  On-chip investigation of cell-drug interactions. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[33]  J. Lammertyn,et al.  Circle-to-circle amplification on a digital microfluidic chip for amplified single molecule detection. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[34]  Fabian Rudolf,et al.  Microfluidic single-cell cultivation chip with controllable immobilization and selective release of yeast cells. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[35]  Anders Blomberg,et al.  Automated screening in environmental arrays allows analysis of quantitative phenotypic profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2003, Yeast.

[36]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference? , 2010, Cell.

[37]  J. Koenderink.  Q… , 2014, Les noms officiels des communes de Wallonie, de Bruxelles-Capitale et de la communaute germanophone.

[38]  Eric P. Y. Chiou,et al.  EWOD-driven droplet microfluidic device integrated with optoelectronic tweezers as an automated platform for cellular isolation and analysis. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[39]  Martin A. M. Gijs,et al.  Realization of hollow SiO2 micronozzles for electrical measurements on living cells , 2002 .

[40]  D. Grier.  A revolution in optical manipulation , 2003, Nature.

[41]  M. Hertog,et al.  Digital microfluidic chip technology for water permeability measurements on single isolated plant protoplasts , 2014 .

[42]  W. D. Ray.  4. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research , 1995 .

[43]  Eleonore Fröhlich,et al.  A Yeast Mutant Showing Diagnostic Markers of Early and Late Apoptosis , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  D. Kent,et al.  High-throughput analysis of single hematopoietic stem cell proliferation in microfluidic cell culture arrays , 2011, Nature Methods.

[45]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.