Evaluating Peripheral Interaction Design

Many actions in the physical world take place in the background or periphery of people’s attention. However, interactions with computing technologies usually require focused attention. This article explores the concept of peripheral interaction: physical interaction with technology that takes place outside the focus of attention. A peripheral interaction design (called FireFlies), which supports primary school teachers in their everyday routine through open-ended light-objects on the children’s desks, was deployed in 4 classrooms for 6 weeks. Results of interviews and video analysis indicate that the 6 participating teachers were able to physically interact with the FireFlies interactive artifact quickly and frequently without disturbing ongoing tasks. In the final weeks of the study, the teachers seemed able to easily shift their focus of attention between their main task and the interactive system. We therefore conclude that, even though it is difficult to measure people’s attention, a longitudinal approach seemed effective to find indicators for peripheral interaction.

[1]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory , 2011, INTR.

[2]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. , 2006 .

[3]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[4]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attention : selection, awareness, and control : a tribute to Donald Broadbent , 1996 .

[5]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[6]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[7]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  FireFlies: physical peripheral interaction design for the everyday routine of primary school teachers , 2013, TEI '13.

[8]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services , 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Supervisory control of action and thought selection. , 1993 .

[10]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Ambient Information Systems: Evaluation in Two Paradigms , 2007, Ambient Information Systems.

[11]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Peripheral tangible interaction by analytic design , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[13]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[14]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Exploring peripheral interaction design for primary school teachers , 2012, TEI.

[15]  H. Aarts,et al.  Habits as knowledge structures: automaticity in goal-directed behavior. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Michael Rohs,et al.  A Taxonomy of Microinteractions: Defining Microgestures Based on Ergonomic and Scenario-Dependent Requirements , 2011, INTERACT.

[17]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[18]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  “Kirk here:”: using genre sounds to monitor background activity , 1993, INTERCHI Adjunct Proceedings.

[19]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[20]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Thinking outside the box a vision of ambient learning displays , 2011 .

[21]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Acting by hand: Informing interaction design for the periphery of people's attention , 2012, Interact. Comput..

[22]  Chris Harrison,et al.  Whack gestures: inexact and inattentive interaction with mobile devices , 2010, TEI '10.

[23]  Tara Matthews,et al.  Defining, Designing, and Evaluating Peripheral Displays: An Analysis Using Activity Theory , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods , 2011, CHI.

[25]  Sean Gustafson,et al.  PinchWatch: A Wearable Device for One-Handed Microinteractions , 2010 .

[26]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  The Multitasking Mind , 2010, Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures.

[27]  Pablo Llinás,et al.  Do Not Disturb: Physical Interfaces for Parallel Peripheral Interactions , 2011, INTERACT.

[28]  Panos Markopoulos A Design Framework for Awareness Systems , 2009, Awareness Systems.

[29]  John Seely Brown,et al.  The coming age of calm technolgy , 1997 .

[30]  S. Jones,et al.  Was There a Hawthorne Effect? , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  ambientROOM: integrating ambient media with architectural space , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[32]  John T. Stasko,et al.  A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design , 2006, AVI '06.

[33]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Issues in evaluating ambient displays in the wild: two case studies , 2011, CHI.

[34]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Distributed Awareness for Class Orchestration , 2009, EC-TEL.

[35]  Chee-Kit Looi,et al.  Integrating technology in the classroom: a visual conceptualization of teachers' knowledge, goals and beliefs , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays , 2003, CHI '03.

[37]  Jacob P. Somervell,et al.  A model for notification systems evaluation—assessing user goals for multitasking activity , 2003, TCHI.

[38]  Steven R. Gordon Computing Information Technology: The Human Side , 2003 .

[39]  Tara Matthews,et al.  Evaluating Peripheral Displays , 2009, Awareness Systems.

[40]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Exiting the Cleanroom: On Ecological Validity and Ubiquitous Computing , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Design for the periphery , 2010 .

[42]  G. Privitera Statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. , 2015 .

[43]  G. R. J. Hockey,et al.  Applied Attention Theory , 2009 .

[44]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[45]  Andreas Butz,et al.  StaTube: facilitating state management in instant messaging systems , 2012, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[46]  Judith Good,et al.  Exploring affective technologies for the classroom with the subtle stone , 2010, CHI.

[47]  Stephen Adams,et al.  Using a large display in the periphery to support children learning through design , 2011, IDC.

[48]  R. Passingham Attention to action. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[49]  H. Aarts,et al.  Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior , 2000 .

[50]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Susan K. Lippert Social issues in the administration of information systems survey research , 2003 .

[52]  N. Sadat Shami,et al.  Context of Use Evaluation of Peripheral Displays (CUEPD) , 2005, INTERACT.

[53]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[54]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Beyond calculation - the next fifty years of computing , 1997 .

[55]  Berry Eggen,et al.  Making Sense of What Is Going on 'Around': Designing Environmental Awareness Information Displays , 2009, Awareness Systems.

[56]  David T. Neal,et al.  A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. , 2007, Psychological review.

[57]  A. Nijholt,et al.  Proceedings of the EuroHaptics 2010 Special Symposium: Haptic and Audio-visual Stimuli: Enhancing Experiences and Interaction , 2010 .