Evaluation of the ‘take time to think’ safer gambling message: a randomised, online experimental study

In October 2021, a majority of the UK gambling industry implemented a new UK safer gambling message, ‘take time to think’, which features on gambling advertising and websites. An effective safer gambling message could plausibly affect several relevant gambling behaviours, with previous research suggesting that message effectiveness is maximised via messages that are displayed prominently immediately prior to gambling. We experimentally tested this message's effect on four contemporaneous gambling behaviours (the proportion of available funds bet, clicks for help service information, the mean speed of play, and the total number of roulette spins made) in an incentivised online roulette game in a sample of UK-based online gamblers. Participants (n = 2,305) were randomly allocated to either (a) ‘no-message’ control, (b) ‘message’ shown throughout the condition or (c) a ‘message+’ condition, where the message was shown throughout and also via a popup immediately prior to the roulette game. Overall, the results showed no credible effects across the four outcome measures when comparing either of the message conditions to the no-message control. Even the prominent display of the ‘take time to think’ message did not lead to credible beneficial effects on a range of contemporaneous gambling behaviours.

[1]  J. Marsden,et al.  Policies and interventions to reduce harmful gambling: an international Delphi consensus and implementation rating study. , 2022, The Lancet. Public health.

[2]  A. Rintoul.  Can slogans prevent gambling harm? , 2022, The Lancet. Public health.

[3]  Elliot A. Ludvig,et al.  Impact of the "when the fun stops, stop" gambling message on online gambling behaviour: a randomised, online experimental study. , 2022, The Lancet. Public health.

[4]  P. Newall,et al.  A speed-of-play limit reduces gambling expenditure in an online roulette game: Results of an online experiment. , 2021, Addictive behaviors.

[5]  M. Petticrew,et al.  “When the Fun Stops, Stop”: An analysis of the provenance, framing and evidence of a ‘responsible gambling’ campaign , 2021, PloS one.

[6]  Sally Melissa Gainsbury,et al.  Encouraging & evaluating limit setting among online gamblers: A naturalistic randomised controlled trial. , 2021, Addiction.

[7]  S. Currie,et al.  A meta‐analysis of problem gambling risk factors in the general adult population , 2021, Addiction.

[8]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Paid online convenience samples in gambling studies: questionable data quality , 2021, International Gambling Studies.

[9]  M. Griffiths,et al.  The Effects of Responsible Gambling Pop-Up Messages on Gambling Behaviors and Cognitions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry.

[10]  David M. Rothschild,et al.  Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research , 2021, Behavior Research Methods.

[11]  Margo Hilbrecht,et al.  Charting a path towards a public health approach for gambling harm prevention , 2021, Journal of Public Health.

[12]  E. Goyder,et al.  Interventions to reduce the public health burden of gambling-related harms: a mapping review. , 2021, The Lancet. Public health.

[13]  Michael Auer,et al.  The use of personalized messages on wagering behavior of Swedish online gamblers: An empirical study , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  G. Meyer,et al.  Multi-venue exclusion program and early detection of problem gamblers: what works and what does not? , 2020 .

[15]  A. Rintoul,et al.  Moving on from responsible gambling: a new discourse is needed to prevent and minimise harm from gambling. , 2020, Public health.

[16]  P. Newall,et al.  Visibility of age restriction warnings, harm reduction messages and terms and conditions: a content analysis of paid-for gambling advertising in the United Kingdom. , 2020, Public health.

[17]  P. Carlbring,et al.  Reaching out to big losers leads to sustained reductions in gambling over one year: A randomized controlled trial of brief motivational contact. , 2020, Addiction.

[18]  Alex M. T. Russell,et al.  Making EGMs Accountable: Can an Informative and Dynamic Interface Help Players Self-regulate? , 2019, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[19]  N. Hing,et al.  Are sports bettors looking at responsible gambling messages? An eye-tracking study on wagering advertisements , 2019, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[20]  Ben J. Smith,et al.  Identifying effective policy interventions to prevent gambling-related harm. , 2019 .

[21]  R. Rogers,et al.  Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm , 2019, BMJ.

[22]  J. Grant,et al.  Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and Problem Gambling: A Meta-analysis , 2016, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[23]  Fang Liu,et al.  A review and comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based inferences in beta regression and zero-or-one-inflated beta regression , 2018, Statistical methods in medical research.

[24]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan , 2017 .

[25]  Mark D Griffiths,et al.  The Case for Using Personally Relevant and Emotionally Stimulating Gambling Messages as a Gambling Harm-Minimisation Strategy , 2016, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[26]  P. Sheeran,et al.  The Intention–Behavior Gap , 2016 .

[27]  M. Browne,et al.  Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: a public health perspective , 2016 .

[28]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  A simple introduction to Markov Chain Monte–Carlo sampling , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Daniel L. Chen,et al.  oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments , 2016 .

[30]  M. Browne,et al.  Jackpot Expiry: An Experimental Investigation of a New EGM Player-Protection Feature , 2015, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[31]  P. Adams,et al.  A tale of missed opportunities: pursuit of a public health approach to gambling in New Zealand. , 2012, Addiction.

[32]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  Relative Earnings and Giving in a Real-Effort Experiment , 2011 .

[33]  Sally Melissa Gainsbury,et al.  The Appropriateness of Using Laboratories and Student Participants in Gambling Research , 2011, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[34]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[35]  Sally Monaghan,et al.  Responsible gambling strategies for Internet gambling: The theoretical and empirical base of using pop-up messages to encourage self-awareness , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..