THE IMPRISONMENT PENALTY PAID BY YOUNG, UNEMPLOYED BLACK AND HISPANIC MALE OFFENDERS

A recent study of sentencing decisions in Pennsylvania (Steffensmeier et al., 1998) identified significant interrelationships among race, gender, age, and sentence severity. The authors of this study found that each of the three offender characteristics had significant direct effects on sentence outcomes and that the characteristics interacted to produce substantially harsher sentences for one category of offenders—young black males. This study responds to Steffensmeier et al.'s (1998:789) call for “further research analyzing how race effects may be mediated by other factors.” We replicate their research approach, examining the intersections of the effects of race, gender, and age on sentence outcomes. We extend their analysis in three ways: We examine sentence outcomes in three large urban jurisdictions; we include Hispanics as well as blacks and test for interactions between ethnicity, age, and gender; and we test for interactions between race/ethnicity, gender, and employment status. Our results are generally—although not entirely—consistent with the results of the Pennsylvania study. Although none of the offender characteristics affects the length of the prison sentence, each has a significant direct effect on the likelihood of incarceration in at least one of the jurisdictions. More importantly, the four offender characteristics interact to produce harsher sentences for certain types of offenders. Young black and Hispanic males face greater odds of incarceration than middle-aged white males, and unemployed black and Hispanic males are substantially more likely to be sentenced to prison than employed white males. Thus, our results suggest that offenders with constellations of characteristics other than “young black male” pay a punishment penalty.

[1]  S. Spitzer.  Toward a Marxian Theory of Deviance , 1975 .

[2]  Halford H. Fairchild,et al.  Chicano, Hispanic, or Mexican American: What's in a Name? , 1981 .

[3]  William D. Bales,et al.  UNEMPLOYMENT AND PUNISHMENT: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT* , 1991 .

[4]  Marjorie S. Zatz.  The Changing Forms of Racial/Ethnic Biases in Sentencing , 1987 .

[5]  Celesta A. Albonetti.  Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Pleas, and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenses, 1991-1992 , 1997 .

[6]  G. Koch,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF INCOME AND OTHER FACTORS ON WHETHER CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS GO TO PRISON , 1976 .

[7]  D. F. Hawkins,et al.  Causal attribution and punishment for crime , 1981 .

[8]  D. Melossi.  An introduction: Fifty years later,Punishment and Social Structure in comparative analysis , 1989 .

[9]  Celesta A. Albonetti.  An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. , 1991 .

[10]  H. Hosch,et al.  Ethnicity, legal resources, and felony dispositions in two southwestern jurisdictions , 1996 .

[11]  Jeffery T. Ulmer,et al.  Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines , 1996 .

[12]  Darrell J. Steffensmeier,et al.  The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male , 1998 .

[13]  H. Triandis,et al.  Stereotyping among Hispanics and Anglos , 1982 .

[14]  G. Marín,et al.  Stereotyping Hispanics: The Differential Effect of Research Method, Label, and Degree of Contact , 1984 .

[15]  Miriam A. Delone,et al.  A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity , 1998 .

[16]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Racial Differences in Criminal Processing: The Consequences of Model Selection on Conclusions About Differential Treatment , 1986 .

[17]  S. Box,et al.  Unemployment, imprisonment and prison overcrowding , 1985 .