Pembrolizumab in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma: 3-year follow-up of the KEYNOTE-151 study

Survival is generally poor for Chinese patients with advanced melanoma because of high rates of acral and mucosal melanoma and limited therapeutic options. The first analysis of the phase 1b KEYNOTE-151 study showed second-line pembrolizumab was well tolerated and had clinically meaningful antitumor activity in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma. Three-year follow-up is presented. Eligible patients were of Chinese descent and had unresectable stage III/IV melanoma that progressed after first-line therapy. Patients received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles. Primary end points were safety and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review. Subgroup analyses were conducted by melanoma subtype and BRAF and PD-L1 status (acral melanoma only). 103 patients were enrolled; median follow-up duration (time from first dose to data cutoff [July 13, 2020]) was 44.6 months (IQR, 39.1–46.2). Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 85.4% of patients, and grade 3/4 TRAEs in 12.6%. No grade 5 TRAEs occurred. Three patients discontinued pembrolizumab because of TRAEs (immune-mediated hepatitis, pneumonia, and arthritis). Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 34.0% (grade 3/4, 2.9%). ORR was 17.6% (95% CI, 10.8–26.4; 1 complete response/17 partial responses), and median DOR was 13.8 months (range, 2.7–37.4+). Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.7–3.5) and 36-month PFS rate was 5.0%. Median OS was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.4–16.5) and 36-month OS rate was 22.3%. Median OS for patients with known melanoma subtype was 14.8 months for acral, 13.5 months for nonacral cutaneous, and 7.4 months for mucosal melanoma. Among the acral subgroup, median OS was 22.8 months for PD-L1–positive disease, 8.4 months for PD-L1–negative disease, 18.5 months for BRAF wild-type disease, and 5.8 months for BRAF-mutant disease. Over 3 years’ follow-up, second-line pembrolizumab continued to show manageable safety, clinically meaningful antitumor activity, and durable responses in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma. Subgroup analysis suggested particular benefit in PD-L1–positive and BRAF wild-type acral melanoma, although small subgroup sizes preclude definitive conclusions. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02821000.

[1]  L. Si,et al.  Immunotherapy in Acral and Mucosal Melanoma: Current Status and Future Directions , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[2]  R. Dummer,et al.  Long-term safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy and relationship with clinical outcome: A landmark analysis in patients with advanced melanoma , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[3]  P. Yin,et al.  Burden of melanoma in China, 1990–2017: Findings from the 2017 global burden of disease study , 2020, International journal of cancer.

[4]  Haifeng Song,et al.  Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Analysis of Toripalimab in Previously Treated Advanced Melanoma: Results of the POLARIS-01 Multicenter Phase II Trial , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  A. Deitz,et al.  Real-world clinical outcomes of anticancer treatments in patients with advanced melanoma in China: retrospective, observational study , 2019, International Journal of Surgery: Oncology.

[6]  Hongwei Lin,et al.  Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Chinese Patients with Advanced Melanoma , 2019, Journal of oncology.

[7]  National Health Commission of PRC Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of melanoma 2018 (English version) , 2019, Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu.

[8]  Y. Fujisawa,et al.  Long‐term follow up of nivolumab in previously untreated Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent malignant melanoma , 2019, Cancer science.

[9]  Yanhong Gu,et al.  A Phase Ib Study of Pembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Chinese Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma (KEYNOTE-151) , 2019, Translational oncology.

[10]  Y. Fujisawa,et al.  Clinical and histopathological characteristics and survival analysis of 4594 Japanese patients with melanoma , 2019, Cancer medicine.

[11]  S. Keam Toripalimab: First Global Approval , 2019, Drugs.

[12]  J. Wolchok,et al.  5-year survival outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab (pembro) in KEYNOTE-001. , 2018 .

[13]  Xingjie Zhang,et al.  The experience of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective case series , 2017, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[14]  M. Fujimoto,et al.  Phase 1b study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475; anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-041) , 2017, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[15]  K. Savage,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Alone or in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Mucosal Melanoma: A Pooled Analysis. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  C. Cui,et al.  Clinical presentation, histology, and prognoses of malignant melanoma in ethnic Chinese: A study of 522 consecutive cases , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[17]  Stuart Moss,et al.  Current Status and Future Directions , 2013 .