A Bayesian Approach in Machine Learning for Lithofacies Classification and Its Uncertainty Analysis

As a qualitative process, classification of subsurface lithofacies is very important for the characterization of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Machine learning has been a potential method to automate the prediction of this parameter based on the well-logging data. In order to incorporate the geological trend into the classification process, a Bayesian approach has been designed in this letter, in which the Markov transition matrix is added. Compared with the Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), a typical representative of machine learning, the proposed Bayesian-ANN (B-ANN), can honor the lithofacies orderings in the vertical direction. A better performance of B-ANN can be observed in the precision–recall curves, as well as indicated by larger values of the average precision. Because of the dominance in the internal transitions within the lithofacies themselves, the posterior probabilities of each lithofacies in B-ANN are less varied than those in ANN.

[1]  Erika Angerer,et al.  Reservoir lithology classification based on seismic inversion results by Hidden Markov Models: Applying prior geological information , 2018 .

[2]  M. Nafi Toksöz,et al.  Estimation of reservoir properties from seismic data by smooth neural networks , 2003 .

[3]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[4]  Timothy R. Carr,et al.  Neural network prediction of carbonate lithofacies from well logs, Big Bow and Sand Arroyo Creek fields, Southwest Kansas , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[5]  Dries Gisolf,et al.  Obtaining a high-resolution geological and petrophysical model from the results of reservoir-orientated elastic wave-equation-based seismic inversion , 2017, Petroleum Geoscience.

[6]  Tadeusz J. Ulrych,et al.  A Bayes tour of inversion: A tutorial , 2001 .

[7]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[8]  L. Baum,et al.  A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains , 1970 .

[9]  Charles L. Karr,et al.  Determination of lithology from well logs using a neural network , 1992 .

[10]  Maarten V. de Hoop,et al.  Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience , 2019, Science.

[11]  Erika Angerer,et al.  Reservoir Lithology Determination by Hidden Markov Random Fields Based on a Gaussian Mixture Model , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  L. Baum,et al.  Statistical Inference for Probabilistic Functions of Finite State Markov Chains , 1966 .

[14]  Xinming Wu,et al.  Application of a convolutional neural network in permeability prediction: A case study in the Jacksonburg-Stringtown oil field, West Virginia, USA , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[15]  Srikanta Mishra,et al.  Applications of machine learning for facies and fracture prediction using Bayesian Network Theory and Random Forest: Case studies from the Appalachian basin, USA , 2018, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[16]  S. Poulsen,et al.  Inverse geothermal modelling applied to Danish sedimentary basins , 2017 .

[17]  Indranil Pan,et al.  Seismic facies analysis using machine learning , 2018, Geophysics.