Application of PROMETHEE-GAIA method for non-traditional machining processes selection

Article history: Received April 17, 2012 Accepted 11 June 2012 Available online June 12 2012 With ever increasing demand for manufactured products of hard alloys and metals with high surface finish and complex shape geometry, more interest is now being paid to non-traditional machining (NTM) processes, where energy in its direct form is used to remove material from workpiece surface. Compared to conventional machining processes, NTM processes possess almost unlimited capabilities and there is a strong believe that use of NTM processes would go on increasing in diverse range of applications. Presence of a large number of NTM processes along with complex characteristics and capabilities, and lack of experts in NTM process selection domain compel for development of a structured approach for NTM process selection for a given machining application. Past researchers have already attempted to solve NTM process selection problems using various complex mathematical approaches which often require a profound knowledge in mathematics/artificial intelligence from the part of process engineers. In this paper, four NTM process selection problems are solved using an integrated PROMETHEE (preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation) and GAIA (geometrical analysis for interactive aid) method which would act as a visual decision aid to the process engineers. The observed results are quite satisfactory and exactly match with the expected solutions. © 2012 Growing Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[2]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  R Jehadeesan,et al.  Web-based Knowledge Based System for Selection of Non-traditional Machining Processes , 2008 .

[5]  Bijoy Bhattacharyya,et al.  Development of an management information system as knowledge base model for machining process characterisation , 2007 .

[6]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Design of an analytic-hierarchy-process-based expert system for non-traditional machining process selection , 2006 .

[7]  Vijay K. Jain,et al.  Advanced Machining Processes , 2014 .

[8]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  A combined TOPSIS-AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection , 2008 .

[9]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  A digraph-based expert system for non-traditional machining processes selection , 2009 .

[10]  W. D. Keyser,et al.  A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods , 1996 .

[11]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process , 2011 .

[12]  Can Cogun Computer-aided system for selection of nontraditional machining operations , 1993 .

[13]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  QFD-based expert system for non-traditional machining processes selection , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Can Cogun Computer-aided preliminary selection of nontraditional machining processes , 1994 .

[15]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment , 2011 .

[16]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[17]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Development of a multi-attribute selection procedure for non-traditional machining processes , 2003 .