Integrating biomass recovery operations into commercial timber harvesting: the New Zealand situation.

In most countries biomass recovery from existing timber harvesting operations is recognised as an important component of any bio-energy program. At present, there are very few biomass recovery operations in New Zealand, despite the very large amount of residue generated by large-scale harvesting operations in plantation forests. Much of this residue is readily available post-harvest at landings, with a major concern being the contamination. Currently, residue constitutes a problem for both processing as well as the subsequent planting. A research project has commenced to help assess what an optimal residue recovery system may be. The paper considers what strategy could be employed to successfully integrate biomass recovery into NZ logging operations, with the integration of biomass recovery into the harvesting operation being key. Based on both international literature as well as extensive field visits three favourable options are established. Productivity and cost estimates are provided: with both the post-harvest residue recovery from the landing using a tub grinder, as well as using off-road trucks to transport the residues to a secondary landing for comminution estimated at 34 NZ$/ton. Whereas the post-harvest option provides for easier logistics, the concurrent recovery option will yield both greater quantity as well as quality biomass. Using a bundler to accumulate slash, and then comminute at the power plant is expected to increase the cost to 44 NZ$/ton. Finally, limitation and future research considerations are also discussed.

[1]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Delivery systems of forest arisings for energy production in New Zealand. , 2001 .

[2]  Jingxin Wang,et al.  Influence of site characteristics and costs of extraction and trucking on logging residue utilization in southern West Virginia , 2007 .

[3]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  A survey of Italian chipping operations , 2001 .

[4]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Landing size of harvesting operations in New Zealand , 2010 .

[5]  A. Asikainen,et al.  Comminution of Logging Residues with Evolution 910R chipper, MOHA chipper truck, and Morbark 1200 tub grinder , 2013 .

[6]  Rien Visser,et al.  Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. , 2009 .

[7]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Current state and development possibilities of wood chip supply chains in Austria , 2006 .

[8]  Ma Zhi-yuan Discussion about Technology and Equipment for Collection and Transportation of Logging Residue , 2007 .

[9]  K. Kärhä,et al.  Productivity and costs of slash bundling in Nordic conditions. , 2006 .

[10]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Logging residue bundling at the roadside in mountain operations , 2009 .

[11]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  Optimal storing, transport and processing for a forest-fuel supplier , 1989 .

[12]  Tomas Gullberg,et al.  Transport and handling of forest energy bundles—advantages and problems , 2006 .

[13]  Rolf Björheden,et al.  Drivers behind the development of forest energy in Sweden , 2006 .

[14]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Landing size and landing layout in whole-tree harvesting operations in New Zealand , 2010 .

[15]  R. Björheden,et al.  Integrating production of timber and energy - a comprehensive view. , 2000 .

[16]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  Harvesting SRF poplar for pulpwood: Experience in the Pacific Northwest , 2006 .

[17]  Bob Rummer,et al.  Assessing the cost of fuel reduction treatments: a critical review , 2008 .

[18]  W. D. Greene,et al.  Utilizing forest biomass by adding a small chipper to a tree-length southern pine harvesting operation. , 2007 .

[19]  Tapio Ranta,et al.  The profitability of transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland , 2006 .

[20]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps , 2007 .