A CONSULTATION GUIDE FOR ASSESSING THE APPLICABILITY OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES:A CASE STUDY

Objectives: The translation of research findings into policy and practice is crucially dependent on the applicability of such findings in a given decision-making context. We explored in a case study whether a generic consultation guide to assess the applicability of a health technology could be rapidly deployed and deliver useful insights. Methods: A consultation guide based on the context and implementation for complex interventions (CICI) framework was developed and piloted to assess the applicability of reinforced home-based palliative care in three European countries. Individual consultations in England and Germany and a panel discussion in Poland were completed. Results: Various barriers may hinder successful implementation of reinforced home-based palliative care in the three countries. Whilst the experts across all countries emphasized the lack of funding along with organization and structure as major barriers, information varied by country for many of the other identified barriers and facilitators. Participants in the pilot study provided positive feedback in terms of understanding the topic and purpose of the consultation, and both individual and panel consultations could be easily implemented. Conclusions: In this case study, the consultation guide presented a pragmatic, ready-to-use tool to assess the applicability of a health technology. As shown here, it can be used in a generic manner without discrete empirical information on the technology in question or, ideally, makes use of specific information collected as part of a HTA. Further studies are needed to validate this guide and apply it to other types of health technologies and more diverse decision-making contexts.

[1]  Muhammad Imran Yousuf,et al.  Using Experts` Opinions Through Delphi Technique , 2007 .

[2]  R Garside,et al.  The harmful health effects of recreational ecstasy: a systematic review of observational evidence. , 2009, Health technology assessment.

[3]  Dario Sacchini,et al.  Integrated assessment of home based palliative care with and without reinforced caregiver support: ‘A demonstration of INTEGRATE-HTA methodological guidances’ – Executive Summary , 2016 .

[4]  Elizabeth Waters,et al.  Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  E. Hennessy,et al.  Focus Groups Versus Individual Interviews with Children: A Comparison of Data , 2006 .

[6]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework , 2017, Implementation Science.

[7]  Nicholas J Hicks,et al.  Development of a toolkit and glossary to aid in the adaptation of health technology assessment (HTA) reports for use in different contexts. , 2009, Health technology assessment.

[8]  Brian Williams,et al.  Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions , 2012, Trials.

[9]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  The PARIHS framework--a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. , 2004, Journal of nursing care quality.

[10]  D. Sherman Reciprocal suffering: the need to improve family caregivers' quality of life through palliative care. , 1998, Journal of palliative medicine.

[11]  Edward F. Fern The use of Focus Groups for Idea Generation: The Effects of Group Size, Acquaintanceship, and Moderator on Response Quantity and Quality , 1982 .

[12]  M. Ventura Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. , 2016, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[13]  W. Menz,et al.  Experteninterviews: Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungsfelder , 2009 .

[14]  Louise Brereton,et al.  AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATE-HTA. , 2017, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[15]  E. Carmeli The Invisibles: Unpaid Caregivers of the Elderly , 2014, Front. Public Health.

[16]  T. Lorenc,et al.  A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[17]  J. Hiller,et al.  Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. , 2006, Health promotion international.

[18]  Bjørn Hofmann,et al.  Complex health care interventions: Characteristics relevant for ethical analysis in health technology assessment , 2016, GMS health technology assessment.

[19]  F. Alla,et al.  Transferability of interventions in health education: a review , 2012, BMC Public Health.