Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.

With respect to acoustic rhinometry, new elements concern the problems related to the interpretation of the minimal cross-sectional area, and the presentation of a protocol for a multinational study, which aims to define a normal nose. Also, the previously issued recommendations for standardisation for technical specifications and standard operating procedures are briefly reviewed. For rhinomanometry, new insights into the field of fluid dynamics are highlighted, as well as their repercussion on more recent graphical representations for active anterior rhinomanometry such as four phases rhinomanometry and resistometry. For acoustic rhinometry as well as rhinomanometry, a more stringent standardisation of decongestive procedures is suggested.

[1]  R. Wentges,et al.  The lateralization percentage as a measure of nasal flow asymmetry in active anterior rhinomanometry. , 1980, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[2]  C. Bachert,et al.  [Quantitative evaluation of rhinomanometric curves. A new simple method]. , 1984, Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie.

[3]  A. Jones,et al.  The objective assessment of nasal patency. , 1991, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[4]  O. Hilberg Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects , 2002, Allergy.

[5]  O. V. Arentsschild Der Nasenwiderstand bei Eigen- und Fremdstrommessung , 2006, Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ohren-, Nasen- und Kehlkopfheilkunde.

[6]  K. Naito,et al.  A comparison of current expressions of nasal patency , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[7]  W. Pirsig,et al.  Diagnostic value of acoustic rhinometry: patients with allergic and vasomotor rhinitis compared with normal controls. , 1990, Rhinology.

[8]  P. Clement,et al.  Rhinomanometry--a review. , 1984, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[9]  R. Eccles,et al.  Comparison of the Relative Abilities of Acoustic Rhinometry, Rhinomanometry, and the Visual Analogue Scale in Detecting Change in the Nasal Cavity in a Healthy Adult Population , 1996 .

[10]  J. Corey,et al.  The Objective Assessment of Nasal Patency , 1993, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[11]  L. Mastalerz,et al.  Nasal provocation test with lysine-aspirin for diagnosis of aspirin-sensitive asthma. , 1998, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[12]  O. Pedersen,et al.  Spontaneous variations in congestion of the nasal mucosa. , 1995, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[13]  G Mlynski,et al.  Correlation of nasal morphology and respiratory function. , 2001, Rhinology.

[14]  O Hilberg,et al.  Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. , 2000, Rhinology. Supplement.

[15]  O. Pedersen,et al.  Acoustic rhinometry: values from adults with subjective normal nasal patency. , 1991, Rhinology.

[16]  A. Jones,et al.  The accuracy of acoustic rhinometry using a pulse train signal. , 1995, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[17]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Nasal resistance--a reliable assessment of nasal patency? , 1995, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[18]  K. Naito,et al.  New aerodynamic aspects of nasal patency. , 1995, Rhinology.