A Simplified Systematic Method of Acquiring Design Specifications From Customer Requirements

Faithfully obtaining design specifications from customer requirements is essential for successful designs. The natural lingual, inexact, incomplete and vague attributes of customer requirements make it very difficult to map customer requirements to design specifications. In general design process, the design specifications are determined by designers based on their experience and intuition, and often a certain target value is set for a specification. However, it is on one hand very difficult, on the other hand unreasonable, so a suitable limit range rather than a certain value is preferred at the beginning of design, especially at the concept design process. In this paper, a simplified systematic approach of transforming customer requirements to design specifications is proposed. First, a two-stepped clustering approach for grouping customer requirements and design specifications based on HOQ matrix is presented, by which the mapping is limited to within each group. To further simplify the inference mapping rules of customer requirements and design specifications, the minimal condition inference mapping rules for each design specification are extracted based on rough set theory. In the end, a suitable value range is determined for a specification by applying the fuzzy rule matrix.Copyright © 2007 by ASME

[1]  Don Clausing.  Total quality development : a step-by-step guide to world class concurrent engineering , 1994 .

[2]  Ronald G. Askin,et al.  Optimal new product design using quality function deployment with empirical value functions , 1999 .

[3]  Juite Wang,et al.  Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 1999 .

[4]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[5]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[6]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system , 1996 .

[7]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods , 2002 .

[8]  Wojciech Ziarko,et al.  Rough Sets and Knowledge Discovery: An Overview , 1993, RSKD.

[9]  Jinxing Xie,et al.  An intelligent hybrid system for customer requirements analysis and product attribute targets determination , 1998 .

[10]  Gerald W. Evans,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Yee Leung,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in incomplete information systems: A rough set approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product portfolio identification based on association rule mining , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[13]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets , 2001 .

[14]  Daniel Vanderpooten,et al.  A Generalized Definition of Rough Approximations Based on Similarity , 2000, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[15]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Quantifying the house of quality for optimal product design , 1994 .

[16]  Marzena Kryszkiewicz,et al.  Rules in Incomplete Information Systems , 1999, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Wei-Zhi Wu,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in incomplete fuzzy information systems via the rough set approach , 2003, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[18]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Design targets determination for inter‐dependent product attributes in QFD using fuzzy inference , 1999 .

[19]  Dominik Slezak,et al.  The investigation of the Bayesian rough set model , 2005, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[20]  Abdul Rahman Omar,et al.  An intelligent information framework relating customer requirements and product characteristics , 2001 .

[21]  Wei-Zhi Wu,et al.  Approaches to knowledge reductions in inconsistent systems , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[22]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Complexity reduction of a design problem in QFD using decomposition , 2000, J. Intell. Manuf..

[23]  Wei-Zhi Wu,et al.  Approaches to knowledge reduction based on variable precision rough set model , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[24]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Fuzzy QFD for supply chain management with reliability consideration , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rudiments of rough sets , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[27]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs , 1997 .

[28]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  Designer-moderated product design , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[29]  Tsau Young Lin,et al.  Rough Set Methods and Applications , 2000 .

[30]  Hsing-Pei Kao,et al.  Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods , 1999 .

[31]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[32]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 2 , 1998 .

[33]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  A variant approach to product definition by recognizing functional requirement patterns , 1997 .

[34]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[35]  John J. Cristiano,et al.  Application of multiattribute decision analysis to quality function deployment for target setting , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[36]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.