Characteristic Complications after Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Cartilage Defects of the Knee Joint

Background Although autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is a well-established therapy for the treatment of isolated cartilage defects of the knee joint, little is known about typical complications and their treatment after ACI. Hypothesis Unsatisfactory outcome after ACI is associated with technique-related typical complications. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods A total of 309 consecutive patients with 349 ACI procedures of the knee joint were analyzed. Three different ACI techniques were used: periosteum-covered ACI in 52 cases (14.9%), Chondrogide (Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland) membrane-covered ACI in 215 cases (61.6%), and a 3-dimensional matrix-associated ACI (BioSeed-C, Biotissue Technologies, Freiburg, Germany) in 82 cases (23.5%). In 52 patients, revision surgery was performed for persistent clinical problems. These patients were analyzed for defect size and location, technique of ACI, and intraoperative findings during revision surgery. The mean time of follow-up for patients after ACI was 4.5 years (standard deviation, ±1.5). Results Four typical major complications were identified: hypertrophy of the transplant, disturbed fusion of the regenerative cartilage and the healthy surrounding cartilage, insufficient regenerative cartilage, and delamination. These diagnoses covered a total of 88.5% of the patients who underwent revision surgery. The overall complication rate was highest in the group of patients treated with periosteum-covered ACI (P = .008). The incidence of symptomatic hypertrophy was 5.2% for all techniques and defect locations; the highest incidence was in patients treated with periosteum-covered ACI (15.4%) (P = .001). The incidence of disturbed fusion was highest in the Chondrogide-covered ACI (3.7%) and the matrix-associated ACI group (4.8%). Concerning the incidence of complications by defect location, there was a tendency for increased complications in patellar defects (P = .095). Within the patellar defects group, no correlation was found for the occurrence of delamination, insufficient regeneration, and disturbed fusion. As a statistical trend, an increased rate of hypertrophy was found for patellar defects (P = .091). Conclusion A major proportion of complications after ACI can be summarized by 4 major diagnoses (symptomatic hypertrophy, disturbed fusion, delamination, and graft failure). Among those, the overall complication rate and incidence of hypertrophy of the transplant were higher for periosteum-covered ACI. Furthermore, an increased rate of symptomatic hypertrophy was found for patellar defects. Therapeutic concepts need to be developed to treat these typical complications of ACI.

[1]  M. Sittinger,et al.  [Chondrocyte transplantation in PGLA/polydioxanone fleece]. , 2000, Der Orthopade.

[2]  N. Südkamp,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects: clinical results referred to defect localisation , 2008, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[3]  A. Burls,et al.  Effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte transplantation for hyaline cartilage defects in knees: a rapid and systematic review. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[4]  J. Wasiak,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for full thickness articular cartilage defects of the knee. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  H. Gerngross,et al.  [MRI vs. arthroscopy in the diagnosis of cartilage lesions in the knee. Can MRI take place of arthroscopy?]. , 2002, Zentralblatt für Chirurgie.

[6]  R. Ojala,et al.  Fat suppression gradient‐echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: Comparison between phase‐contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Michael Sittinger,et al.  The arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[8]  J. Farr Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Improves Patellofemoral Cartilage Treatment Outcomes , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  S. Cannon,et al.  The use of chondrogide membrane in autologous chondrocyte implantation. , 2004, The Knee.

[10]  N. Ghanem,et al.  Classification of graft hypertrophy after autologous chondrocyte implantation of full-thickness chondral defects in the knee. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  C. Clar,et al.  Autologous cartilage implantation for full thickness articular cartilage defects of the knee. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  J. Goodfellow,et al.  Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology. 1. Functional anatomy of the patello-femoral joint. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  T. Sasho,et al.  Evaluation of reparative cartilage after autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondritis dissecans: histology, biochemistry, and MR imaging , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[14]  Eda T Bloom,et al.  Autologous cultured chondrocytes: adverse events reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Patellofemoral Full-Thickness Chondral Defects Treated with Hyalograft-C , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  W W Minuth,et al.  Engineering of cartilage tissue using bioresorbable polymer carriers in perfusion culture. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[17]  P. Kreuz,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of large full-thickness cartilage lesions of the knee. , 2007, Saudi medical journal.

[18]  Anders Lindahl,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  P. Kreuz,et al.  Clinical Results of Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation (ACT) Using a Collagen Membrane , 2003 .

[20]  B. Morrey,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in Chondral Defects of the Knee With a Type I/III Collagen Membrane: A Prospective Study With a 3-Year Follow-up , 2008 .

[21]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  P. Lavigne,et al.  Periosteal autologous chondrocyte implantation for patellar chondral defect in patients with normal and abnormal patellar tracking. , 2006, The Knee.

[24]  B. Oakes,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of focal chondral defects of the knee--a clinical, arthroscopic, MRI and histologic evaluation at 2 years. , 2005, The Knee.

[25]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  J A Skinner,et al.  A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. , 2006, The Knee.

[27]  L. Peterson,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation. , 2006, Instructional course lectures.

[28]  T. Bryant,et al.  The Role of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Patellofemoral Joint , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  J. Goodfellow,et al.  Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology. 2. Chondromalacia patellae. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  B. Oakes,et al.  Reoperation after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Indications and findings. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  U. Nöth,et al.  Cartilage Surgery and Future Perspectives , 2003, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[32]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  [Autologous chondrocyte transplantation for treatment of cartilage defects of the knee joint. Clinical results]. , 2000, Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie.

[33]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Two- to 9-Year Outcome After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  G. Bentley,et al.  A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.