Group Problem-Solving Processes: Social Interactions and Individual Actions

To help consider why some groups solve problems successfully but others do not, this article introduces a framework for analyzing sequences of group members' actions. The dimensions of evaluation of the previous action (supportive, critical, unresponsive), knowledge content (contribution, repetition, null), and invitational form (command, question, statement) organize twenty-seven individual actions, each with specific functions and conditions of use. Evaluations, repetitions and invitational forms link actions together to create coherent social interactions, and thereby serve as possible quantitative measures of collaboration quality. Specific individual action also helps constitute specific social interactions. Six types of social interactions that occur during group problem-solving are organized by problem knowledge distribution (no one knows a problem approach, some know, or everyone knows) and degree of cooperation (independent or cooperative), This framework's mutually exclusive categories and multi-function individual actions allow statistical analyses of many group interactions both in their entirety and in fine detail.

[1]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  "Narrative Analysis" Thirty Years Later , 1997 .

[2]  J. Piaget.  The Moral Judgment of the Child , 1932 .

[3]  Douglas R. Barnes,et al.  Communication and learning in small groups , 1977 .

[4]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[5]  DeepMind,et al.  What's on where , 1994, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[6]  P. L. Adams.  THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[7]  M. Schoen.  The Moral Judgment of the Child. , 1933 .

[8]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[9]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[10]  M. Goodwin.  He-Said-She-Said: Talk As Social Organization Among Black Children , 1993 .

[11]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Exploring Vygotskian Perspectives in Education: the cognitive value of peer interaction , 1985 .

[12]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[13]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[14]  G. M. D. Marco,et al.  Developing Expertise in Coaching: Learning from the Legends. , 1997 .

[15]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action , 1995 .

[16]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments , 1987 .

[17]  Peter Auer,et al.  The contextualization of language , 1992 .

[18]  Elizabeth G. Cohen,et al.  Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom , 1986 .

[19]  G. S. Pettit,et al.  Mothers' social coaching, mother-child relationship style, and children's peer competence: is the medium the message? , 1997, Child development.

[20]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[21]  D. Schiffrin.  Approaches to Discourse , 1997 .

[22]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .

[23]  H. Mehan,et al.  Learning Lessons, Social Organization in the Classroom , 1979 .

[24]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Learning on Achievement in Secondary Schools: A Summary of Research. , 1987 .

[25]  Gail Jefferson,et al.  What's in a `Nyem'? , 1978 .

[26]  Deborah Schiffrin,et al.  Jewish argument as sociability , 1984, Language in Society.

[27]  J. Wertsch,et al.  The Adult-Child Dyad as a Problem-solving System. , 1980 .

[28]  Erving Goffman,et al.  The arrangement between the sexes , 1977 .

[29]  B. Rogoff,et al.  Adult guidance of cognitive development. , 1984 .

[30]  E. Schegloff.  Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[32]  E. Aronson.  The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[33]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[35]  D. Hymes.  Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach , 1974 .

[36]  P. Cobb,et al.  A Constructivist Alternative to the Representational View of Mind in Mathematics Education. , 1992 .

[37]  Dell Hymes,et al.  Foundations of Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach , 1980 .

[38]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[39]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  Grouping for instruction in mathematics: A call for programmatic research on small-group processes. , 1992 .

[40]  J. Gumperz.  Dialect and conversational inference in urban communication , 1978, Language in Society.