Sex role learning in the nuclear family.

In his article, "Freudian Theories of Identification and Their Derivatives" (5), Bronfenbrenner ends his excellent analysis and codification of identification theories with the injunction that what we need is not more theory but more empirical research. He states that elaborate theoretical explanations of assumed phenomena have been made but that in reality "very little is known about the extent of variation in the behavior of fathers and mothers toward sons and daughters, and even less about the possible effects of such differential treatment" (5, P39). We would argue that "very little is known" about parental behavior and identification processes, not because there are no data, but because there is no adequate theoretical explanation to which existing findings can be assimilated and thereby become "known." It is the purpose of this paper to attempt to make theoretical sense out of already available findings, many of which appear anomalous from the standpoint of current orthodoxy, by proposing some simple, but we think crucial, modifications in Freudian and post-Freudian identification theory.

[1]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  Inner Conflict and Defense , 1966 .

[2]  R. Burton,et al.  Antecedents of resistance to temptation in four-year-old children. , 1961, Child development.

[3]  A. Angrilli.  The psychosexual identification of pre-school boys. , 1960, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[4]  U. Bronfenbrenner.  Freudian theories of identification and their derivatives. , 1960, Child development.

[5]  W. Emmerich.  Parental identification in young children. , 1959, Genetic psychology monographs.

[6]  P. Mussen,et al.  Masculinity, identification, and father-son relationships. , 1959, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[7]  S. Gray.  Perceived similarity to parents and adjustment. , 1959, Child development.

[8]  Bennett Em,et al.  Men and women: personality patterns and contrasts. , 1959, Genetic psychology monographs.

[9]  T. Parsons.  Social structure and the development of personality; Freud's contribution to the integration of psychology and sociology. , 1958, Psychiatry.

[10]  D. Brown,et al.  Sex-role development in a changing culture. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[12]  H. Levin,et al.  Patterns of child rearing , 1957 .

[13]  E. W. Goodenough.  Interest in persons as an aspect of sex difference in the early years. , 1957, Genetic psychology monographs.

[14]  R. Bales,et al.  Family, socialization and interaction process , 1956 .

[15]  M. M. Helper.  Learning theory and the self concept. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[16]  A. Brodbeck.  Learning theory and identification. IV. Oedipal motivation as a determinant of conscious development. , 1954, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[17]  R. Tasch.  The Role of the Father in the Family , 1952 .

[18]  A. L. Sopchak.  Parental "identification" and "tendency toward disorders" as measured by the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  D. Aberle,et al.  Middleclass fathers' occupational role and attitudes toward children. , 1952, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[20]  R. Winch.  Further Data and Observations on the Oedipus Hypothesis: The Consequence of an Inadequate Hypothesis , 1951 .

[21]  Arnold W. Green,et al.  The Middle Class Male Child and Neurosis , 1946 .

[22]  H. Deutsch,et al.  Psychology of Women , 1945 .

[23]  Urie Bronfenbrenner,et al.  The Changing American Child — A Speculative Analysis1 , 1961 .

[24]  P. S. Sears.  Doll play aggression in normal young children: Influence of sex, age, sibling status, father's absence. , 1951 .