Implementation of recommendations in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: considerations for development and uptake

A clinical guideline is a document with the aim of guiding decisions based on evidence regarding diagnosis, management and treatment in specific areas of healthcare. Specific to rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), adherence to clinical guidelines recommendations impacts the outcomes of people with these diseases. However, currently, the implementation of recommendations is less than optimal in rheumatology. The WHO has described the implementation of evidence-based recommendations as one of the greatest challenges facing the global health community and has identified the importance of scaling up these recommendations. But closing the evidence-to-practice gap is often complex, time-consuming and difficult. In this context, the implementation science offers a framework to overcome this scenario. This article describes the principles of implementation science to facilitate and optimise the implementation of clinical recommendations in RMDs. Embedding implementation science methods and techniques into recommendation development and daily practice can help maximise the likelihood that implementation is successful in improving the quality of healthcare and healthcare services.

[1]  M. Aringer,et al.  Quality indicators for systemic lupus erythematosus based on the 2019 EULAR recommendations: development and initial validation in a cohort of 220 patients , 2021, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

[2]  F. Barg,et al.  Research Techniques Made Simple: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. , 2021, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[3]  C. Jinks,et al.  Understanding the uptake of a clinical innovation for osteoarthritis in primary care: a qualitative study of knowledge mobilisation using the i-PARIHS framework , 2020, Implementation Science.

[4]  C. Scirè,et al.  Can the adherence to quality of care indicators for early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice reduce risk of hospitalisation? Retrospective cohort study based on the Record Linkage of Rheumatic Disease study of the Italian Society for Rheumatology , 2020, BMJ Open.

[5]  N. Walsh,et al.  Implementation research: making better use of evidence to improve healthcare. , 2020, Rheumatology.

[6]  K. Dziedzic,et al.  Factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. , 2020, Musculoskeletal care.

[7]  M. Dougados,et al.  Development of ASAS quality standards to improve the quality of health and care services for patients with axial spondyloarthritis , 2019, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  Zarnie Khadjesari,et al.  Designing high-quality implementation research: development, application, feasibility and preliminary evaluation of the implementation science research development (ImpRes) tool and guide , 2019, Implementation Science.

[9]  M. Dougados,et al.  Adherence to recommendations for the use of anti–tumour necrosis factor and its impact over 5 years of follow-up in axial spondyloarthritis , 2018, Rheumatology.

[10]  L. León,et al.  EULAR/PReS standards and recommendations for the transitional care of young people with juvenile-onset rheumatic diseases , 2016, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  C. Allaart,et al.  When rheumatologists report that they agree with a guideline, does this mean that they practise the guideline in clinical practice? Results of the International Recommendation Implementation Study (IRIS) , 2016, RMD Open.

[12]  Mike English,et al.  Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation , 2015, International journal of health policy and management.

[13]  P. Nilsen.  Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks , 2015, Implementation Science.

[14]  V. Moore,et al.  Developing a checklist for guideline implementation planning: review and synthesis of guideline development and implementation advice , 2015, Implementation Science.

[15]  M. D. de Wit,et al.  Facilitators to implement standards of care for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: the EUMUSC.NET project , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[16]  A. Woolf,et al.  Development of healthcare quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis in Europe: the eumusc.net project , 2013, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[17]  M. Brouwers,et al.  Integrating guideline development and implementation: analysis of guideline development manual instructions for generating implementation advice , 2012, Implementation Science.

[18]  M. González-Gay,et al.  An Audit of the Variability of Diagnosis and Management of Gout in the Rheumatology Setting: The Gout Evaluation and Management Study , 2011, Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases.

[19]  M. Hetland,et al.  DANBIO--powerful research database and electronic patient record. , 2011, Rheumatology.

[20]  John D. Voss,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[21]  Sally Green,et al.  Measures for assessing practice change in medical practitioners , 2006, Implementation science : IS.

[22]  Luke Vale,et al.  Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998. , 2006, Journal of general internal medicine.

[23]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[24]  M K Campbell,et al.  Systematic review of the long-term effects and economic consequences of treatments for obesity and implications for health improvement. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[25]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care , 2003, The Lancet.

[26]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[27]  A Kitson,et al.  Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. , 1998, Quality in health care : QHC.

[28]  R A Deyo,et al.  Pitfalls of Patient Education: Limited Success of a Program for Back Pain in Primary Care , 1996, Spine.

[29]  A D Oxman,et al.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.