Further results on full-order anti-windup synthesis: exploiting the stability multiplier

Abstract Several approaches to the multivariable anti-windup problem are based on a Lyapunov formulation of the Circle Criterion. Usually these approaches culminate in some form of linear-matrix-inequality (LMJ) feasibility problem, in which the Lyapunov function, the anti-windup compensator state-space matrices and the so-called “stability multiplier” are sought. In general, this is an overparametrised problem, with degrees of freedom available for tuning. Typically, these degrees of freedom are either not used, or they become ’lost’ in the optimisation problem. Here, the full-order anti-windup problem is reconsidered and it is shown how the available degrees of freedom are related to the well-posedness of the closed-loop system. However, it is further shown that full exploitation of the extra degress of freedom is difficult. Ultimately, this leads to the conclusion that an existing form of coprime-factor based anti-windup compensator appears to be ’optimal’.

[1]  David G. Ward,et al.  An antiwindup approach to enlarging domain of attraction for linear systems subject to actuator saturation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  I. Postlethwaite,et al.  A new perspective on static and low order anti-windup synthesis , 2004 .

[3]  I. Postlethwaite,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in anti-windup synthesis , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[4]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Multivariable anti-windup controller synthesis using linear matrix inequalities , 2001, Autom..

[5]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  A. H. Glattfelder,et al.  Stability of discrete override and cascade-limiter single-loop control systems , 1988 .

[7]  Masami Saeki,et al.  Design of a static anti-windup compensator which guarantees robust stability § , 1999 .

[8]  Matthew C. Turner,et al.  Antiwindup for stable linear systems with input saturation: an LMI-based synthesis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  A common framework for anti-windup, bumpless transfer and reliable designs , 2002, Autom..

[10]  P. Hippe,et al.  Windup prevention for unstable systems , 2003, Autom..

[11]  Manfred Morari,et al.  A unified framework for the study of anti-windup designs , 1994, Autom..

[12]  Vincent R. Marcopoli,et al.  Analysis and synthesis tools for a class of actuator-limited multivariable control systems: A linear matrix inequality approach , 1996 .

[13]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Linear conditioning for systems containing saturating actuators , 2000, Autom..

[14]  Guido Herrmann,et al.  Discrete-time anti-windup: Part 1 — Stability and performance , 2003, 2003 European Control Conference (ECC).

[15]  Guido Herrmann,et al.  Discrete-time anti-windup: Part 2 — Extension to the sampled-data case , 2003, 2003 European Control Conference (ECC).

[16]  A. H. Glattfelder,et al.  Stability of override control systems , 1983 .