Comparison between automatic and manual quality grading of sawn softwood

An investigation has been performed to determine the repeatability and the accuracy of automatic and manual grading in a sawmill's final grading station. In total, approximately 400 boards of pine (Pinus sylvestris L) and spruce (Picea abies) of different dimensions are included in the study. The most common automatic grading system for sawmills in the Nordic countries is studied. The study shows that in many cases it is possible to replace manual graders with an automatic system and, at the same time, make production more effective and improve grading, which results in higher value yield. The value yield produced by the automatic system is over 90 percent (91% to 98%) for both boards and planks for both species. The manual grader reached over 92 percent value yield for planks, but only 83 percent for boards. The quality yield for the automatic system is between 52 and 75 percent. The manual grader reached between 31 and 61 percent. The repeatability for the value yield varied between 85 and 96 percent for the manual grader and between 85 and 94 percent for the system. An overshadowing problem in this kind of study is how to obtain an irrefutably true grading result, as all grading of wood is subjective by nature.

[1]  U. Grönlund,et al.  Quality improvements in forest products industry : classification of biological materials with inherent variations , 1995 .

[2]  Philip A. Araman,et al.  Optimum Edging and Trimming of Hardwood Lumber , 1992 .

[3]  Armas Jäppinen,et al.  Automatic sorting of sawlogs by grade , 2000 .

[4]  Powsiri Klinkhachorn,et al.  ALPS yield optimization cutting program , 1989 .

[5]  Sabah U. Randhawa,et al.  An expert system for softwood lumber grading , 1996 .

[6]  Johan Fredriksson,et al.  Automatic grading of sawlogs: A comparison between X-ray scanning, optical three-dimensional scanning and combinations of both methods , 2004 .

[7]  Urs Buehlmann,et al.  Impact of human error on lumber yield in rough mills , 2002 .

[8]  Philip A. Araman,et al.  Evaluation of a multi-sensor machine vision system for automated hardwood lumber grading , 2000 .

[9]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  Automatic grading of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sawlogs using an industrial X-ray log scanner , 2003 .

[10]  Charles W. McMillin,et al.  Lumber defect detection abilities of furniture rough mill employees , 1985 .

[11]  François Grondin,et al.  A Model for the Sawing and Grading of Lumber According to Knots , 2007 .

[12]  Philip A. Araman,et al.  Automated hardwood lumber grading utilizing a multiple sensor machine vision technology , 2003 .

[13]  Philip A. Araman,et al.  Value of Defect Information in Automated Hardwood Edger and Trimmer Systems , 1992 .

[14]  Steve Ruddell,et al.  Industry standards for recognition of marginal wood defects , 1990 .

[15]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  The visual grading system for Scots pine logs in relation to the quality of sideboards produced , 2003 .

[16]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  Predicting the Stiffness of Sawn Products by X-ray Scanning of Norway Spruce Saw Logs , 2001 .