Human-robot contact in the safeguarding space

In this paper, we discuss a human-robot (H-R) coexistent system which allows H-R contact actions in the safeguarding space mechanically bounded by the human pain tolerance limit. The first half of this paper describes our study on the evaluation of the human pain tolerance limit which determines an individual's safeguarding space. We also show the human-safety-oriented design of a robot. The robot is covered with a viscoelastic material to achieve both impact force attenuation and contact sensitivity, keeping within the human pain tolerance limit. The robot, with simple direct-drive (DD) motor torque detection and emergency stop capabilities, automatically stops whenever any severe H-R contact occurs. In the second half of the paper, we propose a more efficient H-R system, which allows H-R contact for improving work efficiency, as long as the contact does not exceed the human pain tolerance limit. For this purpose, a robot is controlled to reduce its velocity with high reliability at an incipient stage of its contact with a human. Through experiments, we demonstrate the validity and efficient utility of the safeguarding space. The first experiment verifies that the developed robot exerts a contact force less than the human pain tolerance limit establishing the safeguarding space. The second experiment comparatively shows the robot's velocity reduction to accept a safe contact with the human in the space.

[1]  M. Mukaidono,et al.  Application of window comparator to majority operation , 1989, Proceedings. The Nineteenth International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic.

[2]  H. Merskey,et al.  Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. , 1994, Pain. Supplement.

[3]  R. Mcfarland,et al.  The Human Body in Equipment Design , 1966 .

[4]  Vladimir J. Lumelsky,et al.  Real-time collision avoidance in teleoperated whole-sensitive robot arm manipulators , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  Mansour Rahimi Human perception of robot safe speed and idle time , 1990 .

[6]  Hisao Oka Meaning of Measured Results of Biomechanical Impedance and the Stiffness Index , 1992 .

[7]  Toshiyuki Murakami,et al.  Torque sensorless control in multidegree-of-freedom manipulator , 1993, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[8]  John T. Feddema,et al.  A capacitance-based proximity sensor for whole arm obstacle avoidance , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Hikaru Inooka,et al.  Study on emotional evaluation of robot motions based on galvanic skin reflex , 1995 .

[10]  James H. Graham,et al.  A Safety and Collision Avoidance System for Industrial Robots , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[11]  Yoji Yamada,et al.  A failure-to-safety "Kyozon" system with simple contact detection and stop capabilities for safe human-autonomous robot coexistence , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Human induced instability in powered hand controllers , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  Control of robot directly maneuvered by operator , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '93).

[14]  J D HARDY,et al.  Adaptation of thermal pain in the skin. , 1962, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  Yoji Yamada,et al.  A Proximity-Tactile Sensor to Detect Obstacles for a Cylindrical Arm , 1988 .