Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)

Abstract Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores are commonly used by clinicians when determining patient response to treatment and to guide clinical decision-making during the course of treatment. For research purposes, the MCID score is often used in sample size calculations for adequate powering of a study to minimize the false-positives (type 1 errors) and the false-negatives (type 2 errors). For clinicians and researchers alike, it is critical that the MCID score is a valid and stable measure. A low MCID value may result in overestimating the positive effects of treatment, whereas a high MCID value may incorrectly classify patients as failing to respond to treatment when in fact the treatment was beneficial. The wide range of methodologies for calculating the MCID score results in varied outcomes, which leads to difficulties with interpretation and application. This clinimetrics corner outlines key factors influencing MCID estimates and discusses limitations with the use of the MCID in both clinical and research practice settings.

[1]  P. Anderson,et al.  Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  D L Riddle,et al.  The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[3]  Ross D Crosby,et al.  Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  M J Buxton,et al.  Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[5]  S. Haley,et al.  Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[6]  A. Copay,et al.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  R. Tashjian,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  A. Nordwall,et al.  The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[9]  P. Stratford,et al.  Baseline Dependency of Minimal Clinically Important Improvement , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[10]  Peter Croft,et al.  Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain: Towards International Consensus Regarding Minimal Important Change , 2008, Spine.

[11]  D. Beaton,et al.  Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. , 2002, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[12]  Walter Grassi,et al.  Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale , 2004, European journal of pain.

[13]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  Jeremy S. Lewis,et al.  Outcome measures in chronic low back pain , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[15]  K. Roach,et al.  Measurement of Health Outcomes: Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness , 2006 .

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .

[17]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[18]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[19]  A. Carr,et al.  Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[20]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  L. Bouter,et al.  Minimal Clinically Important Change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for Patients With Neck Pain , 2007, Spine.

[22]  C. Cook,et al.  A comparison of 3 methodological approaches to defining major clinically important improvement of 4 performance measures in patients with hip osteoarthritis. , 2011, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[23]  C. Terwee,et al.  Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  K. Meadows,et al.  The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. , 1999, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[25]  A. Beurskens,et al.  Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments , 1996, Pain.

[26]  G. Regehr,et al.  Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  C. Cook.  Clinimetrics Corner: The Minimal Clinically Important Change Score (MCID): A Necessary Pretense , 2008, The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy.

[28]  J. Cleland,et al.  Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.