Neutron emission in F 19 -induced reactions

[1]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Excitation functions of heavy residues produced in the N 14 + Rh 103 reaction up to 400 MeV: Analysis of the pre-equilibrium mechanism with the hybrid Monte Carlo simulation model , 2016 .

[2]  M. D'Agostino,et al.  Pre-equilibrium Emission and α-clustering in Nuclei , 2015 .

[3]  Vijay R. Sharma,et al.  Systematic study of pre-equilibrium emission at low energies in 12 C- and 16 O-induced reactions , 2015 .

[4]  B. V. Carlson,et al.  Comparison of approximations to the transition rate in the DDHMS preequilibrium model , 2014 .

[5]  Santanu Pal,et al.  Neutron multiplicity measurements for 19 F+ 194 , 196 , 198 Pt systems to investigate the effect of shell closure on nuclear dissipation , 2013 .

[6]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Effect of N/Z in pre-scission neutron multiplicity for , 2013 .

[7]  S. Kailas,et al.  Search for an effect of shell closure on nuclear dissipation via a neutron-multiplicity measurement , 2012 .

[8]  B. V. Carlson,et al.  Fermi breakup and the Statistical Multifragmentation Model , 2010, 1001.1306.

[9]  R. G. Pillay,et al.  Fission time scale from prescission neutron, proton, and α particle multiplicities in 28 Si+ 175 Lu , 2006 .

[10]  M. Chadwick,et al.  Precompound Monte-Carlo model for cluster induced reactions , 2000 .

[11]  M. Chadwick,et al.  New precompound decay model: Angular distributions , 1998 .

[12]  Blann New precompound decay model. , 1996, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[13]  Chadwick,et al.  Continuum angular distributions in preequilibrium nuclear reactions: Physical basis for Kalbach systematics. , 1994, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[14]  Raman,et al.  Density of discrete levels in 116Sn. , 1993, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[15]  Chadwick,et al.  Particle-hole state densities with linear momentum and angular distributions in preequilibrium reactions. , 1992, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[16]  Bisplinghoff Configuration mixing in preequilibrium reactions: A new look at the hybrid-exciton controversy. , 1986, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[17]  J. Hogan,et al.  Emission of alpha particles in the interaction of 10–85 MeV protons with48,50Ti , 1981 .

[18]  L. Milazzo,et al.  Analysis of precompound processes in ( p,n) reactions with the statistical multistep direct emission theory , 1981 .

[19]  Herman Feshbach,et al.  The statistical theory of multi-step compound and direct reactions , 1980 .

[20]  A. Gavron Statistical model calculations in heavy ion reactions , 1980 .

[21]  S. K. Kataria,et al.  Erratum: Semiempirical nuclear level density formula with shell effects , 1979 .

[22]  S. K. Kataria,et al.  Semiempirical nuclear level density formula with shell effects , 1978 .

[23]  R. Bass Nucleus-nucleus potential deduced from experimental fusion cross sections , 1977 .

[24]  F. Perey,et al.  Compilation of phenomenological optical-model parameters 1954–1975 , 1976 .

[25]  M. Blann,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF THE NUCLEAR DENSITY DISTRIBUTION ON PRE-EQUILIBRIUM DECAY. , 1972 .

[26]  J. Griffin Energy dependence of average direct reaction cross sections and partial nuclear level densities , 1967 .

[27]  J. Griffin,et al.  Statistical Model of Intermediate Structure , 1966 .

[28]  A. G. W. Cameron,et al.  A COMPOSITE NUCLEAR-LEVEL DENSITY FORMULA WITH SHELL CORRECTIONS , 1965 .

[29]  G. Igo,et al.  Theoretical reaction cross sections for alpha particles with an optical model , 1962 .

[30]  Victor F. Weisskopf,et al.  On the Yield of Nuclear Reactions with Heavy Elements , 1940 .

[31]  Niels Bohr,et al.  The Mechanism of nuclear fission , 1939 .