Bearing-fault diagnosis using non-local means algorithm and empirical mode decomposition-based feature extraction and two-stage feature selection

Bearing-fault-diagnosis problem can be conceived as a pattern recognition problem, which includes three main phases: feature extraction, feature selection and feature classification. Thus, to improve the performance of the whole bearing-fault-diagnosis system, the performance of each phase must be improved. The aim of this study is threefold. First, in the feature extraction step, a new feature extraction technique based on non-local-means de-noising and empirical mode decomposition is developed to more accurately obtain fault-characteristic information. Second, in the feature selection phase, a novel two-stage feature selection, hybrid distance evaluation technique (DET)–particle swarm optimisation (PSO), is proposed by combining DET and PSO to select the superior combining feature subset that discriminates well among classes. Third, in the classification phase, a comparison among three types of popular classifiers: K-nearest neighbours, probabilistic neural network and support-vector machine is done to figure out the sensitivity of each classifier corresponding to the irrelevant and redundant features and the curse of dimensionality; then, find out a most suitable classifier incorporating with feature selection phase. The experimental results for the vibration signal of the bearing are shown to verify the effectiveness of the proposed fault-diagnosis scheme.

[1]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[2]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Experimental Investigation for Fault Diagnosis Based on a Hybrid Approach Using Wavelet Packet and Support Vector Classification , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[3]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  Probabilistic neural networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[4]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Gérard-André Capolino,et al.  Advances in Diagnostic Techniques for Induction Machines , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  Cheng-Lung Huang,et al.  A distributed PSO-SVM hybrid system with feature selection and parameter optimization , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[7]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[9]  Yaguo Lei,et al.  Application of an intelligent classification method to mechanical fault diagnosis , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  H. Henao,et al.  Diagnosis of Broken Bar Fault in Induction Machines Using Discrete Wavelet Transform without Slip Estimation , 2007, 2007 IEEE Industry Applications Annual Meeting.

[11]  Peter W. Tse,et al.  Wavelet Analysis and Envelope Detection For Rolling Element Bearing Fault Diagnosis—Their Effectiveness and Flexibilities , 2001 .

[12]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Early fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on wavelet packets—Empirical mode decomposition feature extraction and neural network , 2012 .

[14]  Haifeng Gao,et al.  A hybrid fault diagnosis method using morphological filter–translation invariant wavelet and improved ensemble empirical mode decomposition , 2015 .

[15]  D. Thukaram,et al.  Application of support vector machines for fault diagnosis in power transmission system , 2008 .