How to decide on the priorities and coordination of information society policy? Analytical framework and three case studies

Purpose – ICT is everywhere, but information society policy cannot address all the sectors and policy issues in which ICT plays a role. This paper's aim is to develop an analytical framework to assist policy makers in deciding on the priorities and coordination of information society policy.Design/methodology/approach – The analytical framework is based on public management literature and innovation literature. The framework can be applied to individual ICT issues – when to lead, advise, explore or refrain from policy intervention. The framework consists of seven questions, including the rationale for intervention, stakeholders, the mandate of fellow policy makers (e.g. other ministries) and the costs, benefits and risks of intervention. The framework was applied in three cases.Findings – A leading role for information society policy is most clear for e‐skills. For services innovation, several market failures and system failures appear to be relevant. This calls for a mix of policy instruments, with roles...

[1]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction , 1993 .

[2]  Charles Edquist.  The Internet and Mobile Telecommunications System of Innovation: Developments in Equipment, Access and Content , 2003 .

[3]  John T. Scott,et al.  The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation , 2000 .

[4]  W. Parsons,et al.  Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis , 1996 .

[5]  Wrr.  Het borgen van publiek belang , 2000 .

[6]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe , 2009 .

[7]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[8]  J. Bryson.  What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[9]  A. Schmid,et al.  Vetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid , 1987 .

[10]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[11]  H. V. Dalen,et al.  De Calculus van het Publieke Belang , 2003 .

[12]  Johan Hauknes,et al.  Economic rationales of government involvement in innovation and the supply of innovation-related services , 1999 .

[13]  Janita F. J. Vos,et al.  Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis , 2008 .

[14]  R. Smits,et al.  The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy , 2004 .

[15]  E. Noam.  Reconnecting Communications Studies with Communications Policy. , 1993 .

[16]  Pierre Lascoumes,et al.  Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation , 2007 .

[17]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination , 1998 .

[18]  A. Richards,et al.  Handbook of Strategic Planning , 1989 .

[19]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[20]  Keith Smith.  Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy , 2000 .

[21]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[22]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy , 2006 .

[23]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[24]  C. Pérez.  Technological revolutions and financial capital : the dynamics of bubbles and golden ages , 2003 .

[25]  Innovation in information society policy : Rationale, policy mix and impact in The Netherlands , 2009 .

[26]  Robin Mansell,et al.  The Debate over Critical vs. Administrative Research: Circularity or Challenge , 1983 .