Self-, other-, and ideal-judgments of risk and caution as a function of the five-factor model of personality

Abstract We predicted that four ‘Big Five’ personality dimensions—Openness, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, and Conscientiousness—would be related to participants’ responses to decisions in risky and cautious situations. Three hundred and five students completed the NEO PI-R [ Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources ]. They then made self-other-, and ideal-judgments on risky and cautious dilemmas [ Kogan, N. & Wallach, M. (1964). Risk-taking: a study in cognition and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston ]. People high in Openness made more extreme self- and ideal-judgments on risky dilemmas. People high in Agreeableness made more extreme, socially valued judgments across risky and cautious dilemmas. People high in Conscientiousness made more extreme ideal judgments on cautious dilemmas. People high in Neuroticism made more extreme ideal-judgments on risky dilemmas. These findings suggest that personality influences people’s perceptions of risk and caution.

[1]  D. G. Pruitt.  Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. , 1971 .

[2]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[4]  Y. Rim.  Personality and group decisions involving risk , 1964 .

[5]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts , 1977 .

[6]  David L. Evans,et al.  The Role of the Big Five Personality Dimensions in the Direction and Affective Consequences of Everyday Social Comparisons , 1999 .

[7]  M. Billig,et al.  Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization , 1971 .

[8]  D. J. Schneider,et al.  Test of the "risk is a value" hypothesis. , 1969 .

[9]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[10]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  The Handbook of Mental Control , 1992 .

[11]  Y. Rim.  Risk-taking and need for achievement , 1963 .

[12]  M. Wallach,et al.  Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality , 1965 .

[13]  Y. Rim.  Machiavellianism and decisions involving risk. , 1966, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[14]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  Conclusions: Toward an understanding of choice shifts in group discussion. , 1971 .

[15]  David Watson,et al.  Behavioral disinhibition versus constraint: A dispositional perspective , 1993 .

[16]  D. Watson,et al.  Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  C. Judd,et al.  The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussions. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  A. Tellegen,et al.  An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  K A Kiehl,et al.  Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  J. Block.  A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  D. McAdams,et al.  The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal. , 1992, Journal of personality.