Prenatal growth map of the mouse knee joint by means of deformable registration technique

Joint morphogenesis is the process during which distinct and functional joint shapes emerge during pre- and post-natal joint development. In this study, a repeatable semi-automatic protocol capable of providing a 3D realistic developmental map of the prenatal mouse knee joint was designed by combining Optical Projection Tomography imaging (OPT) and a deformable registration algorithm (Sheffield Image Registration toolkit, ShIRT). Eleven left limbs of healthy murine embryos were scanned with OPT (voxel size: 14.63μm) at two different stages of development: Theiler stage (TS) 23 (approximately 14.5 embryonic days) and 24 (approximately 15.5 embryonic days). One TS23 limb was used to evaluate the precision of the displacement predictions for this specific case. The remaining limbs were then used to estimate Developmental Tibia and Femur Maps. Acceptable uncertainties of the displacement predictions computed from repeated images were found for both epiphyses (between 1.3μm and 1.4μm for the proximal tibia and between 0.7μm and 1.0μm for the femur, along all directions). The protocol was found to be reproducible with maximum Modified Housdorff Distance (MHD) differences equal to 1.9 μm and 1.5 μm for the tibial and femoral epiphyses respectively. The effect of the initial shape of the rudiment affected the developmental maps with MHD of 21.7 μm and 21.9 μm for the tibial and femoral epiphyses respectively, which correspond to 1.4 and 1.5 times the voxel size. To conclude, this study proposes a repeatable semi-automatic protocol capable of providing mean 3D realistic developmental map of a developing rudiment allowing researchers to study how growth and adaptation are directed by biological and mechanobiological factors.

[1]  A. Pitsillides,et al.  Short-term rigid and flaccid paralyses diminish growth of embryonic chick limbs and abrogate joint cavity formation but differentially preserve pre-cavitated joints. , 2002, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[2]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  Mechanical Influences on Morphogenesis of the Knee Joint Revealed through Morphological, Molecular and Computational Analysis of Immobilised Embryos , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  J. Sharpe,et al.  Immobilized chicks as a model system for early‐onset developmental dysplasia of the hip , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  B. Hogan,et al.  Manipulating the mouse embryo: A laboratory manual , 1986 .

[5]  TaubinGabriel,et al.  The Ball-Pivoting Algorithm for Surface Reconstruction , 1999 .

[6]  Dr. Karl Theiler The House Mouse , 1989, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[7]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Local displacement and strain uncertainties in different bone types by digital volume correlation of synchrotron microtomograms. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Martin Johnson Manipulating the mouse embryo: A laboratory manual: by B. Hogan, F. Constantini and E. Lacy, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1986. $60.00 (332 pages) ISBN 0 87969 175 1 , 1986 .

[9]  J H Heegaard,et al.  Mechanically modulated cartilage growth may regulate joint surface morphogenesis , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Efficient computational fluid dynamics mesh generation by image registration , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  J. Sharpe Optical projection tomography. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[12]  M Viceconti,et al.  About the inevitable compromise between spatial resolution and accuracy of strain measurement for bone tissue: a 3D zero-strain study. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Masahiro Iwamoto,et al.  Mechanisms of synovial joint and articular cartilage formation: recent advances, but many lingering mysteries. , 2005, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[14]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Developing bones are differentially affected by compromised skeletal muscle formation , 2010, Bone.

[15]  D. Kingsley,et al.  Muscle contraction is necessary to maintain joint progenitor cell fate. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[16]  Obsmara Ulloa,et al.  Developing , 2021, Jane Austen, Early and Late.

[17]  S. Succi,et al.  Numerical Methods and Advanced Simulation in Biomechanics and Biological Processes , 2017 .

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[19]  J. Hecksher-Sørensen,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002, Science.

[20]  M. Chiquet,et al.  Mechanical modulation of tenascin‐C and collagen‐XII expression during avian synovial joint formation , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  I. Meulenbelt,et al.  Hip Ontogenesis: How Evolution, Genes, and Load History Shape Hip Morphotype and Cartilotype , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  D. Allan,et al.  Bone morphology of the femur and tibia captured by statistical shape modelling predicts rapid bone loss in acute spinal cord injury patients. , 2015, Bone.

[23]  J. Vane,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002 .

[24]  Ken Turkowski,et al.  Filters for common resampling tasks , 1990 .

[25]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Quantification of Alterations in Cortical Bone Geometry Using Site Specificity Software in Mouse models of Aging and the Responses to Ovariectomy and Altered Loading , 2015, Front. Endocrinol..

[26]  L. Cristofolini,et al.  Precision of Digital Volume Correlation Approaches for Strain Analysis in Bone Imaged with Micro-Computed Tomography at Different Dimensional Levels , 2017, Front. Mater..

[27]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  Damien Lacroix,et al.  In silico bone mechanobiology: modeling a multifaceted biological system , 2016, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[29]  S. Shefelbine,et al.  Effects of normal and abnormal loading conditions on morphogenesis of the prenatal hip joint: application to hip dysplasia , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  J. Sharpe,et al.  Joint shape morphogenesis precedes cavitation of the developing hip joint , 2013, Journal of anatomy.

[31]  K. Theiler The house mouse. Development and normal stages from fertilization to 4 weeks of age. , 1972 .

[32]  André F. Pereira,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Mechanics on Biological Growth , 2018 .

[33]  J. Sharpe,et al.  Preparation of mouse embryos for optical projection tomography imaging. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[34]  Sandra J Shefelbine,et al.  Mechanobiological simulations of prenatal joint morphogenesis. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  L. Sandell Etiology of osteoarthritis: genetics and synovial joint development , 2012, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[36]  D C Barber,et al.  Automatic segmentation of medical images using image registration: diagnostic and simulation applications , 2005, Journal of medical engineering & technology.