From business process management to business process ecosystem

New technologies, notably service-oriented architectures and Web services, are enabling a third wave of business process management (BPM). Supporters claim that BPM is informed by complexity theory and that business processes can evolve and adapt to changing business circumstances. It is suggested by BPM adherents that the business/IT divide will be obliterated through a process-centric approach to systems development. The evolution of BPM and its associated technologies are explored and then coevolutionary theory is used to understand the business/IT relationship. Specifically, Kauffman's NKC model is applied to a business process ecosystem to bring out the implications of coevolution for the theory and practice of BPM and for the relationship between business and IT. The paper argues that a wider view of the business process ecosystem is needed to take account of the social perspective as well as the human/non-human dimension.

[1]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics , 1993 .

[2]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[3]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests. , 1973 .

[4]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Usability Engineering Lifecycle , 1993 .

[5]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[6]  E. Mitleton-Kelly,et al.  Co-Evolution and an Enabling Infrastructure: A Solution to Legacy? , 2000 .

[7]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[8]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[9]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes , 1999 .

[10]  Fritjof Capra,et al.  The Hidden Connections , 2002 .

[11]  Stafford Beer,et al.  The Viable System Model : its provenance , development , methodology and pathology * Stafford Beer = President of the World Organization for Systems and Cybernetics , 2000 .

[12]  S. Clegg.  The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies , 2006 .

[13]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[14]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[15]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Beyond Alignment: A Coevolutionary View of the Information Systems Strategy Process , 2003 .

[17]  Tim Rowley.  Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[18]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Interdependent Benefits from Interorganizational Systems: Opportunities for Business Partner Reengineering , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Reengineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions? , 1994, MIS Q..

[20]  Shouhong Wang,et al.  The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity , 1999 .

[22]  Wim Hordijk,et al.  Correlation analysis of coupled fitness landscapes , 2005, Complex..

[23]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[24]  SiggelkowNicolaj,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability , 2003 .

[25]  Eric D. Beinhocker.  Robust Adaptive Strategies , 1999 .

[26]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[27]  L. Melin,et al.  Innovative Forms of Organizing , 2003 .

[28]  A. Lewin,et al.  Prolegomena on Coevolution: a Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[29]  James Kohnen,et al.  X-Engineering the Corporation: Reinventing Your Business in the Digital Age , 2003 .

[30]  Sara K. Kearns,et al.  The Agenda: What Every Business Must Do to Dominate the Decade , 2002 .

[31]  Varun Grover,et al.  From business reengineering to business process change management: a longitudinal study of trends and practices , 1999 .

[32]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[33]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  Data Base Special Issue - Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes , 1999, Data Base.

[34]  Ian P. McCarthy,et al.  Technology management - a complex adaptive systems approach , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[35]  Andrea Taylor-Cummings,et al.  Bridging the user-IS gap: a study of major information systems projects , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[36]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[37]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Interorganizational business process redesign: merging technological and process innovation , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[38]  Varun Grover,et al.  Special Section: Toward a Theory of Business Process Change Management , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[40]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[41]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  Escaping the Red Queen Effect , 1995 .

[42]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[43]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[45]  P. Raven,et al.  BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION , 1964 .

[46]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[47]  F. Capra.  THE WEB OF LIFE : A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter , 1996 .

[48]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Science and Organization Studies , 2006 .

[49]  J. Metcalfe.  Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction , 2002 .

[50]  Jan W. Rivkin.  Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[51]  Philip J. Streatfield,et al.  The paradox of control in organizations , 2001 .

[52]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Information systems and the double mangle: steering a course between the Scylla of embedded structure and the Charybdis of strong symmetry , 1998 .

[53]  Tracy Seneca,et al.  Out of the box: strategies for achieving profits today and growth tomorrow through web services , 2003 .

[54]  Howard Smith,et al.  Business Process Management: The Third Wave , 2003 .

[55]  Michael Stal,et al.  Web services: beyond component-based computing , 2002, CACM.

[56]  N. Carr.  IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.